Quote from: Kirito89 on December 27, 2024, 09:01:16 AM

Quote from: Horsbyname on December 27, 2024, 07:23:03 AM

Contradiction in Your Statements:
Initially, you claimed that the blackmail email came from an address identical to mine. Now, you’re saying it’s "the same email but with a few changes." Which is it? Changing your narrative like this only highlights your lack of credibility.

I've never claimed that it came from an identical email address as yours, which can be clearly seen from my chat history here, I was however pretty sure the blackmailer is you. Which turned out to be correct.

Quote from: Horsbyname on December 27, 2024, 07:23:03 AM

Timeline of Events:
I made my post here on November 29. According to the screenshot you provided earlier, the first blackmail email you received was on December 7. This clearly indicates that someone saw my post, created an email similar to my user name 'as shown on your Screenshot: https://imgur.com/a/OKAlIXC and tried to scam you. I immediately clarified when you posted the screenshot, stating not to pay anyone and that I was not behind those emails.

The timeline actually matches the way you used to try this type of scam in the past, create a fake story on bitcointalk, get traction, put up a few false 1 star reviews on trustpilot get traction, then proceed with the blackmail attempts a few days, week later so you can "show" the effect your campaign has.

Someone didn't create an email similar to your username, someone matched your exact email address, which is part your username and part completely different, so here is the part where you slipped up. And the 2nd part I already addressed in my previous post.

Quote from: Horsbyname on December 27, 2024, 07:23:03 AM

Confirmation from HolyDarkness:
I’ve already posted a screenshot where [b[HolyDarkness also confirmed that the scammer’s claims were invalid. Yet, despite this, you continue to accuse me baselessly, ignoring both my clarification and the acknowledgment from an impartial observer. https://imgur.com/a/Ir5qqAu [/b]

Holydarkness simply gave an objection opinion where he said the blackmailer might be someone else as he's treated this entire thread as an impartial 3d party, as he should.

Quote from: Horsbyname on December 27, 2024, 07:23:03 AM

Your History of Paying Blackmailers:
I’m wondering why DuckDice.io is paying supposed blackmailers even when you claim to know they are blackmailers. For example, you admitted paying someone who claimed their bet was unfair, even though you said you believed it was fair. Doesn’t this seem suspicious? It looks like you paid them to prevent exposure of something more damaging. However, even after you paid, the unfairness of your practices eventually came to light. You can’t hide the truth forever.

You should know this story quite well, cause the original owner of that account never actually made a thread on bitcointalk about it, the story should be here as I've posted it in the past year, aswell as a confirmation from the original owner.

Quote from: Horsbyname on December 27, 2024, 07:23:03 AM

Invest in Fairness Instead:
Instead of paying blackmailers to cover up your flaws, I recommend you focus on being fair. Use that money to address system failures and ensure transparency in your operations. This would not only improve your reputation but also prevent legitimate users from questioning your practices.

Our provably fair system works just fine, as its been for the last 8 years we've been opperating, as it was proven in your case aswell, by a 3d party from this forum. But you ignore these parts, due to trying to make more "noise" and bury the relevant info.

Quote from: Horsbyname on December 27, 2024, 07:23:03 AM

Deflecting from the Core Issue:
It’s evident that you’re using this fabricated blackmail narrative to divert attention from the real issue—my concerns about unfair betting outcomes and your refusal to provide transparent data. This is a blatant attempt to tarnish my credibility and distract readers from DuckDice.io’s questionable practices.

There is no fabricated blackmail narrative, the only fabrication here is your thread. I've shared a screenshot with the initial contact from our blackmailer, YOU! We have provided transparent data, analyzed by khaleed and holydarkness, which you have refuted. The point of the matter is, you're simply looking for a hand-out, and believe that the more noise you make with your fake allegations, that somehow we'll crack under pressure and pay you anything. And I'm here to say one more time you will not be receiving a single dime from Duckdice.

Kirito89,
Duckdice Support.

You’re accusing me without concrete proof, relying solely on your assumptions.

I have already publicly stated—and even provided screenshots—showing that I never sent any emails demanding money from you. In fact, I explicitly told you not to pay anyone claiming to be me.
After hearing that you paid to blackmailers, It’s becoming increasingly suspicious how, whenever someone raises legitimate concerns about Duckdice.io on public platforms, you mysteriously receive emails claiming to be from that person in an attempt to blackmail you.

Is it truly a coincidence that these emails always seem to appear conveniently after someone publicly calls you out? This raises serious questions about your narrative and whether these “blackmail attempts” are being fabricated or manipulated as a tactic to discredit anyone who challenges your platform.

If I may - When exactly did you last pay a blackmailer, and what was the specific issue they were using to blackmail you? What made you so afraid that you decided to pay them despite claiming their accusations were baseless?

I’ve repeatedly asked you to provide proof that I sent those blackmail emails, but you’ve failed to provide any evidence whatsoever. Instead, you come up with a different story every time, completely ignoring my questions related to the case.

Avoiding the Core Issue: Fairness
Your entire strategy seems to revolve around discrediting me personally while avoiding the original point of this thread: the fairness of your platform.
•   I suffered an unprecedented 158-loss streak with a 15.5% win probability, which is statistically improbable.
•   You stated that you have provided bet history related to my account. However, you know very well that the bet history you provided is useless:
•   It does not indicate whether each bet was a winning or losing bet, making it impossible to verify the fairness of the streak I experienced.
•   Without this crucial detail, your so-called "evidence" is meaningless and does nothing to prove your claims about the fairness of the bets.

Regarding your claims about the so-called “blackmailer” emails, let me clarify something you keep twisting: I never stated it was a coincidence that you received emails from scammers with an email address similar to mine. What I said was that the scammer used my username, as clearly shown in the screenshot of the email you posted earlier. It’s you who keeps changing the narrative to suit your claims. You seem to conveniently ignore this distinction to push your baseless accusations against me.