Quote from: Kirito89 on December 30, 2024, 11:55:36 PM

Quote from: holydarkness on December 30, 2024, 05:23:59 PM

Okay, this thread got reopened and the inevitable confusion that follows, having to address two simultaneous threads that's identical yet different is several minor details, has already begun.

OP, to straighten two things:

DuckDice's explanation through Kirito89's statement never changed. I've explained about this numerous times in your other thread. If there is any discrepancies or changed narrative, it's just because you misinterpret them, be it intentionally or unintentionally. I believe I've explained about this consistency on their narrative to an extent. I would advise you to really give them a read and try to understand the situation I am trying to help you understand through those words.

Second [and I am somewhat sure you'll say I am siding with DuckDice, taking money from them, biased, and the likes after reading the following sentence. I can assure you that I am not, but of course, I can't force you on a perspective] if there is any change in narrative and discrepancies, it's actually from you.

First you want a proof of PF and the losing streak. The PF has been explained exhaustively, about how there are several other independent 3rd party verifier aside from what they provided themselves, and I think we can pretty much rest assured that the chance they're manipulating rounds are somewhat minimal. Because otherwise, there will be at least a dozen of scam accusations raised against them with valid proof where the result of PF did not match what their platform said. I doubt there were not any people who randomly check the PF, and from these people, FJ happen to have the rounds where the outcome were not manipulated.

They must have a five-leafed clover if they could pull such stunt.

So, the lack of valid complaint that they're caught red-handed with manipulated outcome, where what's shown on their platform were different from the PF verification, would be an inferred testament that their game is indeed fair.

This bring us to the last of your concern, the losing streak, and this is where, IMO, your narrative is the one that changed, not theirs. First you gave a piece of info [the screenshot], and when DuckDice, with the huge help of khaled0111 actually managed to reconstruct the betting history, with the result pending you said,

Quote from: Horsbyname on December 21, 2024, 03:49:02 PM

Quote from: Kirito89 on December 21, 2024, 02:55:53 PM

Sorry for the delayed response, I've been a bit busy with holiday preparations.

So here is the OP's bet, with server seed unhashed.

Server seed unhashed: b36be07c87f1e0abe44f325cb4e7c80f7c8db147838d2532ca560bf549e86c47

Server seed hashed: cdd08e0c9cd4c8c25730b7c8168849164f06a192dc891b5fb10008ef767e631d

Client seed: PCEazJjcLcOyfxN0pOUbpK2dLdfqqa

The nounce the OP provided is 9650, So I assume his bet happened before then.

He claims somewhere on this seed a 158 losing streak on 15% happened, so if any fine bitcointalk members will be able to automate this to give out a spreadsheet of each bet would be very helpful, if not I'll get to it eventually, though I might be a bit delayed with holiday season.

Kirito89,

Duckdice Support.

I will wait for either you or any other Bitcointalk members to verify the streak, as you mentioned. If someone from the community can automate this and produce a spreadsheet of all bets on this seed, it would indeed be very helpful.

I hope this process can finally bring clarity to my concerns. Once the results are confirmed, I’ll act accordingly and update my posts and reviews based on the findings. Let’s work together to resolve this matter in a fair and transparent manner.

Upon a result that the losing streak did not exist, rolled the next key-information, [I deliberately quote in full instead of snippet so people who did not read the other thread will have a better chance of understanding the communication that transpired]

Quote from: Horsbyname on December 23, 2024, 02:34:12 PM

Quote from: Kirito89 on December 22, 2024, 02:22:14 PM

Quote from: khaled0111 on December 22, 2024, 02:04:29 PM

Quote from: Kirito89 on December 22, 2024, 12:41:41 PM

Will check aswell for under 8449 (15.5% chance on the other side) but I'm guessing it will be something similar, which is not even close to the 158 losing streak he claims.

I just checked it too and can confirm the numbers you gave are correct.
- For bets with 15.5% win chance on under 1550, the longest losing streak is 41, from roll number 12 to roll number 51.
- For bets with 15.5% win chance on over 8449, the longest losing streak is 57, from roll number 5074 to roll number 5130.

Thank you for confirming it aswell. Really appreciate your help on this matter.

So with this, its been proven that OP's claim of the 158 red streak on 15.5% chance is in fact a lie...

Really appreciate your help on this khaled0111 and also a big thank you to holydarkness, if you didn't catch that part where OP posted a picture of one of his bets, we would not have been able to come upon his actual bet history and to be able to disprove his false claim.

Kirito89,
Duckdice Support.

Thank you for reviewing the streak, but I want to clarify that the bet I provided was from an earlier session and was shared only to prove my presence and account ownership. The 158 losing streak I mentioned occurred much later, possibly close to or even beyond 35k bets.

Before hitting that unbelievable 158-loss streak, I also experienced multiple smaller streaks, such as 30, 40, or even 70-75 losses in a row. These streaks were frustrating, but what truly felt suspicious was how the outcomes seemed to react to my actions. For example, whenever I switched sides, the results would immediately favor the opposite side. At some points, it genuinely felt like Duckdice was playing against me.

I would be truly glad if you could restore access to my account so I can personally review all my bets. That would satisfy me greatly and help clear up my doubts. It also raises questions because earlier, it was claimed that my account and bet history no longer existed, yet now you’ve been able to provide information about my bets. This inconsistency only adds to my concerns, and I hope for clarity moving forward.

Can you enlighten us what actually happened here and why that statement only came out after they disprove the claim of losing streak? While previously you simply said that you wait for the verification, without mentioning that the data will be useless? You could and should have mentioned it right then and there where Kirito stated as below, that the data would be irrelevant, so what happened?

Quote from: Kirito89 on December 21, 2024, 02:55:53 PM

He claims somewhere on this seed a 158 losing streak on 15% happened,[...]

Hey holydarkness, I really appreciate your help on this matter, though unfortunately I think you're fighting a lost cause, there are certain numbers of things that OP will ignore, and simply continue spamming in both threads in the hopes of getting traction and managing to get some bonus $ out of duckdice, these things are:

1. OP claimed he suffered a 158 streak on 15.5%, he (unfortunately for him) shared a screenshot of one of his bets that showed his server/client seed that he was playing on, and thus with the help of khaleed we were able to prove that this streak didn't happen, as soon as we did that, OP changed his entired narrative, claiming that he manually changed bets, thus being unable to verify it.

2. OP has magically come up with this accusation 1 year after this happened, after he reuquested a GDPR account removal, which basically means all data linked to the account is deleted by us

3. In the same time our trustpilot rating started tanking due to false reports taking our rating from 4.2 to a 2.1, he claims its a coincidence, though we've dealt with this in the past, a false allegation comes on bitcointalk mixed with a spam in trustpilot reviews in the hopes of making Duckdice pay him something to stop this (it's the same person)
4. OP didn't take into account, that the blackmailer's email, and his email are unique, only separated by 1 letter, so if someone was trying to take advantage of his bitcointalk thread, there would be no way of guessing his unique email, I've actually asked him in the other thread if he gives me permission (due to GDPR constraints) to disclose his email, which he conviniently ignored, so regardless of any reason provided by you, or me, or anyone else for that matter, he will simply ignore it and spam the thread so he can push his narrative.

Again I'd like to thank you for objective support on this matter!

Kirito89,

Duckdice Support.

1. You claim that the fairness of the seed I gambled on has been independently verified by Khaleed. However, I’m still waiting for concrete proof that this verification was conducted transparently and thoroughly. The so-called verification you’re referring to doesn’t even show a winning or losing bet. It just shows a number that could be either a win or a loss, without any clear indication of the actual outcome. As Khaleed himself mentioned, this data is useless because it doesn’t prove anything about the actual bets or outcomes. Yet, you’ve taken his statement out of context and twisted it in your favor to suit your narrative.

Regarding your request to publicly disclose the email address I’ve been in contact with you on – let me be clear: I have NEVER engaged in any form of blackmail. Your attempts to tarnish my reputation with these false claims are uncalled for.
Here is my Email: https://imgur.com/a/ZbWExwU the Blackmailer that you posted: https://imgur.com/a/OKAlIXC

It’s clear that you’re more focused on deflecting and trying to shift the narrative rather than addressing the actual issues at hand. This matter will now be pursued through legal means, and we’ll see where that leads.

Edit : Since you ignored earlier:

Is it truly a coincidence that these emails always seem to appear conveniently after someone publicly calls you out? This raises serious questions about your narrative and whether these “blackmail attempts” are being fabricated or manipulated as a tactic to discredit anyone who challenges your platform.

If I may - When exactly did you last pay a blackmailer, and what was the specific issue they were using to blackmail you? What made you so afraid that you decided to pay them despite claiming their accusations were baseless?

It seems you’ve made yet another baseless accusation, claiming that I said it’s a coincidence the blackmailer’s email is similar to mine. Let me ask you directly: where did I ever say that? If you cannot provide proof of this statement, I expect a public apology for the damage you’re doing to my reputation in this thread.

To refresh your memory, I’ve already shared a screenshot link where you made this claim. Here’s the link again for everyone’s reference: https://imgur.com/a/QySz8vs

Additionally, I want the Bitcointalk community to witness what Duckdice representatives are doing in public forums—constantly shifting narratives, twisting facts, and making baseless accusations. If this is how they handle public discussions, it makes me wonder: what are they doing in private messages with users? How far does this behavior go when there’s no public scrutiny?