Post
Topic
Board Scam Accusations
Re:Exposing Stake.com’s Manipulated “Provably Fair” Games: Evidence of Rigged
by
kingbj21
on 02/01/2025, 09:41:49 UTC
Happy New Year to all players and gambling truth-seekers!

While most are celebrating, Stake.com continues to operate a house of cards—a fraudulent empire built on lies and rigged games, ready to collapse under the weight of truth. Let’s shake this crooked facade to its very foundation.

Stake Originals: A Crumbling Façade

Stake aggressively promotes its “Stake Originals,” games they fully control. Why? Because these games are their playground of deception, where RTP, house edge, and outcomes are manipulated at will.

The Evidence Speaks for Itself:

Player 1 (@BlackJacky):

Total Bets: 180,904
Wins: 78,285
Losses: 86,612
Net Loss: 8,327 bets
Deviation Beyond Max: 9.3x higher than statistically possible.

Player 2 (KingBJ):

Total Bets: 119,156
Expected Loss (0.5%): $7,392
Actual Loss: $60,000
Deviation Beyond Max: 24.66σ.

These numbers don’t just stretch the truth—they annihilate it. Even in gambling, randomness has rules, and Stake.com blatantly violates them to rob its players blind.

AHOYBRAUSE: The Jester of Lies

This delusional Stake puppet had the audacity to claim a 0.5% house edge means a 99.5% chance of winning. 🤡 Do you even understand what you're saying? Your math is as shaky as Stake’s fraudulent foundation.

You’ve failed to provide any credible defense, instead hiding behind petty insults and childish banter. How much does Eddie pay you to peddle this nonsense? Here’s a tip: Instead of trolling forums, sign up for a statistics course. You’re embarrassing yourself.

HolyDarkness: Another Piece of the Farce

Joining AHOYBRAUSE is HolyDarkness, symphonizing Stake’s lies as if we’re all too stupid to notice. Guess what? Your fake confidence and hollow arguments are as transparent as the rigged blackjack games you defend.

Eddie and Stake.com: The Cracks Are Showing

Stake’s CEO, Eddie, admitted in chats that RTP can be modified without notifying players. Translation:

Your chances of winning are whatever Stake wants them to be.

The advertised RTP is a smokescreen—they pull the strings behind the curtain.

Big players are targeted for higher losses during recovery bets.

Stake’s empire of deceit is crumbling. Their manipulation is no longer a secret, and their failure to comply with GDPR requests further exposes their shady practices.

Your House Is Shaking, Eddie

Eddie and Stake, your carefully crafted facade is cracking under the weight of truth. The players are waking up, and your days of deception are numbered.

AHOYBRAUSE and HolyDarkness, you’re nothing but court jesters in Eddie’s crumbling castle. Your hollow arguments are as weak as the house of cards you represent.

Call to Action

Players, it’s time to fight back against this fraud:

Demand transparency: Force Stake to release unaltered betting data for public scrutiny.

Report Stake: File complaints with gambling regulators, particularly the Curacao Gaming Control Board.

Expose the truth: Share your experiences, evidence, and this post far and wide.

Final Blow:

AHOYBRAUSE, HolyDarkness, and Stake.com—your facade is shaking, your foundation is cracking, and the truth is roaring through the cracks. 2025 will be the year we bring down this house of lies.

Happy New Year to all truth-seekers. To Stake.com and its puppets: Your time is up. The storm is coming. 🌪️


I ROFL’d on ‘The Jester of Lies’

AHOYBRAUSE still did not explain why he quoted the percentages of winning and losing a Black Jack hand, but he meanwhile informed us that he is

Yes he did, several times, with links:

https://www.winstar.com/blog/blackjack-odds/#:~:text=The%20player%20has%20about%20a,cents%20in%20the%20long%20run.
https://www.onlinegambling.com/blackjack/odds/
https://www.mrgreen.com/blackjack/strategies/blackjack-odds
https://www.gamblingzone.com/uk/blackjack/odds/

I could post 10000 more sites that ALL tell you that chance of winning a BJ hand are 42.2%. But hey, since reading and understanding basic math is not your forte I can understand that this must be very confusing for you.
Guess you better ask someone in person to explain this to you and your "friend".  Roll Eyes

🎭 AHOYBRAUSE: The Jester of Lies Returns 🚩 

Oh, look who’s back—AHOYBRAUSE, the self-proclaimed Scholar of Statistics and part-time Clownfish of Evasion. 🐟🎪 

First off, let me congratulate you on mastering the fine art of deflection and condescension. Bravo! Truly, you’ve managed to turn a simple conversation into a circus act, and we’re all here for the show. Round of applause, everyone! 👏👏👏 



🎯 Let’s Address the "42.2%" Comedy Routine 

Yes, you did link several sources claiming 42.2% odds of winning a Blackjack hand. However: 
1️⃣ BlackJacky wasn’t asking for the *odds of winning a hand;* he questioned your understanding of house edges, RTP, and payout manipulations in *Stake’s rigged ecosystem*. 
2️⃣ Your links are generic at best—none of them address Stake’s specific Blackjack game dynamics. Posting 10000 irrelevant sources won’t make your point valid; it just makes you look desperate. 



🧵 The Art of Evading Questions 

Let’s revisit what you conveniently avoided: 
- Why did you ignore Stake’s documented manipulation of RTPs and payout structures? 
- Can you provide data proving Stake’s games aren’t rigged, or are you here to misdirect with public Blackjack odds? 

Every time someone challenges your argument, you respond with arrogance and zero substance. This isn’t a debate; it’s a comedy roast where you’re the headliner. You’re making Eddie proud. 👏 



🤡 AHOYBRAUSE: The Clownfish of Stake 

You’re Stake’s perfect mascot: 
1️⃣ You dodge valid points faster than Eddie dodges GDPR compliance. 
2️⃣ Your “math lessons” are as enlightening as Syztmz’s erratic streams. 
3️⃣ You specialize in vomiting deflections and hoping nobody notices. Spoiler: We do. 



🔍 Let’s Get Real 

AHOYBRAUSE, here’s what you really are: a Stake apologist throwing sand over the truth. You’re the Jester of Lies, distracting the audience while the castle crumbles behind you. But here’s the thing: we’re not here for your smoke and mirrors. 

You’ve failed to address: 
- Stake’s manipulation of RTPs. 
- The rampant issues with transparency in their games. 
- How affiliates like Syztmz approve accounts with failed KYC checks. 



🚨 Final Thoughts 

AHOYBRAUSE, your circus act is entertaining, but it doesn’t hold up under scrutiny. You’re just another clownfish swimming in Eddie’s sandstorm, hoping to distract us from the crumbling facade of Stake.com. 

Here’s a tip for 2025: 
- Stick to facts. 
- Stop deflecting. 
- Learn that arrogance doesn’t equal intelligence. 

Until then, we’ll be here—laughing, documenting, and exposing the truth. 🎭 

P.S.: Feel free to quote another 10000 irrelevant sites. It’s amusing, if nothing else. 

#StakeExposed #JesterOfLies #TheClownfishChronicles