Supporting your flag would betray my belief that Rollbit are not 100% guilty here, and opposing your flag would betray my belief that you were in tight
So, if not 100%, by what percentage would you say they’re guilty?
As I think I've made my opinion about this case very clear, by an --IMO-- exhaustively long and repetitive explanation, I somehow think that instead of a real curiosity and a query for my stance for this case, the question is more to fish or stir something. So, I'll try a different approach to answer to your question:
By what percentage would you say OP is guilty?
That’s easy, 0%.
As an arbiter, shouldn’t you focus on holding these platforms to higher standards instead of consistently shifting blame onto users who may not have been fully aware of the risks? This seems to be a recurring pattern, and I’m not just referring to this case.