Quote from: BlackyJacky on January 03, 2025, 10:25:37 AM

Though clownfish AHOYBRAUSE is the one who will become rich when he loses 0,5% of every bet amount! Cheesy

I don't think he ever said this. Nobody thinks this, and if you don't like the concept of a house edge then you shouldn't be playing blackjack. But I also realize you are just trolling. I honestly can't believe attacking casinos with such easily disprovable fud was ever actually a profitable endeavor. Seems like a ridiculous waste of time on planet earth. Sure, there's a lot of shady casinos out there, but you should be attacking actual fraud, not based around your reimagined definition of house edge.

For example, its impossible to take this seriously:

Quote from: BlackyJacky on January 03, 2025, 10:25:37 AM

Quote from: nutildah on January 03, 2025, 04:57:05 AM

Quote from: BlackyJacky on December 21, 2024, 02:29:36 PM

The advertised house edge for the Stake in-house Black Jack is 0,5%, which means longterm I will lose 0,5% of all bets placed.

That's incorrect.

That is 100% correct!

If I placed 5 x 100 USD, then I statistically will lose 5 x 0,5% from 100 USD = 2,5% from 500 USD = 12,5 USD.

You are still equating "bets placed" with "bet amount returned", assuming an equal payout for each win, and an equal amount lost for each loss. Because Blackjacks pay 2-to-1, it is likely that the # of losing bets will be greater than 0.5%, because Blackjacks pay double but only count as one bet.

Also claims like this:

Quote from: BlackyJacky on January 03, 2025, 07:21:16 PM

Problem is that I lost 10 times more than the advertised 50,25% losing percentage = 52,3% losing percentage!

180,900 bets is indeed a good size to prove rigged games!

As your screenshot is, no one but Stake to verify this is your account, and that the numbers displayed on the screen aren't altered.