Quote from: holydarkness on January 03, 2025, 08:30:54 PM

Quote from: tetaeridanus on January 03, 2025, 06:36:05 PM

Hello holydarkness, what do you mean as guilty?

Did you see the DT owlcatz reasoning for opposition?

Isn't abuse of DT or power banned in this forum?

What am I quilty for, If I may ask? Asking for my redemption?

Thanks.

As I said on my reply that you quoted, I believe I've make my view of this case extremely clear. Feel free to revisit our entire conversation as I am not in the mood to write another wall of text that I've already written several times.

About DT, I've also explained this to you. He's entitled to his opinion. If he think your flag deserve an opposition, then frankly, he's entitled to oppose it, just like people are entitled to support the flag with each of their own reasoning.

IF the DTs think owlcatz abuses his DT power, they will extensively discussing it and take action for it. So my advise [again] is to leave that be out of your concern for the time being. I believe you're well understand that you can't force one's will and opinion to others? Well, more or less, that's what applied here.

Quote from: tetaeridanus on January 03, 2025, 06:41:39 PM

Holydarkness,

While I was writing my reply to you,

I saw that you posted a reply to this thread and I wanted to answer this;

Quote from: holydarkness on December 23, 2024, 09:22:35 AM

[...]
As I mentioned on the earlier paragraph, though, it does not translate as me closing my eyes. I simply wait [and ignore all of the jabs you throw at me] for Rollbit compliance team's conclusion. After that...

https://talkimg.com/images/2024/12/22/Dvnn8.jpeg[...]

I have numerously times thanked for your gesture about this, why did this topic came here?

Simple. That person above us believe I continuously shifting blames to players [semantics applied here], so instead of throwing tantrum and writing offensive sentences, I do what adult do: challenge him of his statements.

I believe we all can see and understand and agree that the point he tried to say is that I am taking Rollbit's side and shift the blame to you, so there, instead of arguing with empty words and name-calling, I take action in line with how this board works: evidence. I provide an evidence as a rebuttal that disputed his claim that I have a recurring pattern of shifting blame to users.

Broken down, it's a question of how exactly I shifted blame to users [and inferred, taking side of the casinos, not trying to get platform on a "higher standard"] while I go to a length that I barely do to other casinos to get this player something.

While we're at it, Blossom15, I am being serious here, I am waiting for those explanation and list. This is not me exfoliating my skin so it is not as thick as it used to be, or cleaning my ears that it is not as selectively-deaf as it was in the past, nor washing my eyes so the partial blindness eased considerably.

This is being tired of parrying and taking jabs and reminding people that at a public forum, free speech does not equal to freedom of consequences. So, Blossom15, own your words and prove your statements.

Quote from: holydarkness on December 23, 2024, 09:22:35 AM

While you quoted it, I may ask; if Razer still didn't reply, do you think this is a apporpriate action accordingly?

Refer to paragraph 14 of this post [that's the one with "One, that is my..."], plus, Razer actually has not been online since I wrote that PM [last online as per when this post was made is 17th Dec], so there are a very huge chance he has not read that message.

Quote from: tetaeridanus on January 03, 2025, 06:41:39 PM

We can see that only 2 DT's opposed the flag to this day with both unjustified evidence, unlike all the evidence I have shown.

You can also count the people that replied to that thread, and majority seems like saying I deserve compansation.

Refer to the post about "DT politics" and what I wrote above about owlcatz.

Quote from: tetaeridanus on January 03, 2025, 06:41:39 PM

What do you think about this? It is important for me.

Thanks in advance.

Tetaeridanus.

At this point? Trust me, you don't want me to write in public on what I think about this. Paragraph 20 of the same post I linked above would have a relation to this.

Some might argue that this is me abusing my DT power by "being silent" and not pointing the obvious [though the cat is actually already out of the bag] or perhaps a chance to question my judgment capability. But I'll argue that this is me waiting and see, with a splash of that "OP's shoes and Rollbit's glasses".

Quote from: tetaeridanus on January 03, 2025, 07:32:45 PM

[...]

So this accusation will be closed based on these fools?

I will boldly assume you're referring to the status on my list.

On that case, no, as I said, that thread is not authoritarian, I will be waiting for the final verdict by DTs vote by 31st January and use that as the verdict of your case.

If the flag is active, then I'll mark it as "unresolved". On the contrary, if the flag remains inactive, then I'll take the exhaustive step we've taken [you contacting support, me having Razer to get it retried without other dept. past decision influencing the outcome, me PMing him for a middle way] is a conclusion that the case is indeed a no-case. Thus, resolved.

in case you're not familiar with it, as you raised a type-3 flag, you'll need 3 DT supporting the flag than the ones opposing it, and currently you're at -1, as there is 1 DT supporting and 2 DT opposing [1-2=-1], means you'll at least need 4 more DTs support [1-=4=3=active], unless the opposing DT retract their opposition.

Quote from: tetaeridanus on January 03, 2025, 07:32:45 PM

I am waiting for your warm reply holydarkness.

This writings are nothing personal to you, but my outburst of this situation.

Tell me, if I am getting the response I deserve here.

Best regards.

Tetaeridanus.

So that is my answer. Either it's warm or cold or harsh, I leave you to decide. I am hoping that the effort I take [it took me about an hour, TBH] to make this post does not meet with the same series of jabs you gave me in the past, as I don't want to regret my decision on onca again dipping my toe on this case.

Draft 3: Twist the Knife and Deliver the Final Blow

"HolyDarkness: The Casino Puppet Master with Zero Strings Attached to Reality"

Ladies and gentlemen, let’s take a moment to admire the sheer audacity of HolyDarkness, a guy so committed to his casino-pimping lifestyle that he’s turned gaslighting victims into an art form.

Holy Lies, Batman!

“I’m drafting on mobile,” he says, like we’re gullible enough to believe this nonsense.

1. Writing essays on mobile?
- Do you have the fingers of a pianist and the stamina of a marathon runner? No one churns out 2,000-word essays on a tiny screen without making it look like a kindergarten ransom note.
- Post your draft timestamps, show us your mobile drafts in progress, or quit this charade. You’re not multitasking on-the-go; you’re parked somewhere drafting in Word like the amateur spin doctor you are.

2. Are you even a gambler?
- How much have YOU wagered? Because we’re tired of your lectures about casino practices when your real-life gambling experience is probably limited to flipping Monopoly money.
- If you’ve never wagered your hard-earned cash and faced losses due to rigged systems, then shut your pie hole. You have ZERO authority to mock victims.

The Anatomy of a Hypocrite

HolyDarkness doesn’t just fail to advocate for victims; he actively ridicules them. He wears the mask of reason while wielding a dagger to the backs of anyone seeking accountability.

- “I’m neutral.”
- Neutrality is a myth when you’re constantly siding with casinos and finding ways to invalidate complaints. If neutrality is your badge, your uniform’s long overdue for a recall.

- "I’m waiting for proof."
- Proof? You can’t even prove your own arguments! You evade questions, twist narratives, and drown threads in pseudo-intellectual garbage.

Casino Trivia: Let’s School the “Expert”

1. What’s the exact house edge of American roulette?
- It’s 5.26%, by the way, in case your mobile fingers can’t Google fast enough.
2. How do provably fair algorithms ensure transparency in crypto casinos?
- Spoiler alert: they don’t fully guarantee fairness, and the loopholes are wide enough to drive a truck through.
3. Define variance in gambling terms.
- Don’t know? Then how are you qualified to even speak about gambling at all?

Blow-by-Blow Breakdown of His Hypocrisy

1. Mocking Victims:
- You treat every legitimate grievance like a joke while propping up casino narratives.
- Your condescending tone doesn’t intimidate—it just highlights your lack of empathy and makes you look like a paid clown.

2. Dodging Accountability:
- You throw around big words and vague ideas, yet when cornered, you duck behind generic platitudes. Answer the questions or sit down.

3. Blaming the Players:
- “They didn’t read the terms.” Neither did you, apparently, considering how often you parrot incomplete casino policies.

Unmasking the Puppet Master

Question for HolyDarkness:

- How much are the casinos paying you? Is it per post or per victim gaslit?
- When will you stop hiding behind your fake neutrality and admit you’re nothing but a glorified casino shill?

If you think you’re untouchable, think again. Your verbose nonsense isn’t intellectual; it’s cowardice wrapped in thesaurus vomit.

Endgame

You’re not a protector of truth, you’re an enabler of fraud. Your elaborate essays and dismissive replies are just tools to suppress the voices of victims. You’re not here to resolve conflicts—you’re here to ensure the house always wins.

HolyDarkness, you’re done. Your mask is shattered, your lies are exposed, and your credibility is non-existent. If you can’t even defend yourself without spinning in circles, then get off the stage.

This thread deserves clarity and justice—not your casino-approved garbage.