Quote from: Coin_trader on January 11, 2025, 03:29:39 AM

Quote from: BlackyJacky on January 08, 2025, 09:22:24 PM

Thank you for confirming that Stake's in-house games are rigged, because in this case (and only in this case), the advertised house edge has indeed absolutely NOTHING to do with the chance of winning! Wink

If the games are fair, then the house edge determines the chance of winning = RTP = Return To Player: 100 minus house edge = RTP

I think you are just going back to circle here.

No, it is news that @AHOYBRAUSE confirmed that Stake's in-house games are rigged!

I set a trap for him and he fell into it! Cheesy

Quote from: Coin_trader on January 11, 2025, 03:29:39 AM

RTP display is for the total win amount of all players divided by the total wager on that specific game meaning it’s not same to everyone.

No, the advertised house edge determines the RTP = Return To Player.

For example, if the advertised house edge is 0,5%, then the RTP is 99,5%.

A RTP of 99,5% means that from each bet amount placed you statistically will get 99,5%

Quote from: Coin_trader on January 11, 2025, 03:29:39 AM

RTP varies on each user experienced for example you sucks on playing then your RTP will be low.

At Black Jack, your expected personal house edge depends on your personal playing style.

Quote from: Coin_trader on January 11, 2025, 03:29:39 AM

Theoretical house edge is what you are pertaining and I doubt this will be helpful on proving your case due to the small sample size.

You do not need a huge sample size to prove that games are rigged!

The difference is, the smaller the sample size, the higher is the maximal possible deviation from the expected outcome = advertised house edge.

But if your experienced deviation is substantial higher than the maximal possible deviation, then this is 100% proof that the game is rigged!

My case is 100% proven: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2178857.msg64908309#msg64908309

Quote from: Coin_trader on January 11, 2025, 03:29:39 AM

No one here will have free time to check your bets 1 by 1 to determine how do you play so I suggest seek help of 3rd party arbitrator to deal with your case.

No one will check 180,900 bets manually and it is also not necessary because Stake did not dispute my claim.

They did not say that my playing style caused a 4,6% house edge and they also did not dispute the validity of my Stake statistics.

Their explanation why I experienced a 9,3 times higher deviation like maximal possible is that only after 1 million bets the RTP applies.