What qualifies you to do dispute mediation?
Again, as I already answered
here, nothing.
I misunderstood your answer:
But that shouldn't be any concern since i didn't do dispute resolution between players and online casinos where my words bind them all.
I understood you don't do dispute resolution, but now reading it again you said you don't do it in a way where your words bind them all.
So you believe as long as your words don't bind them all, it does not matter that you are not qualified.
I have to disagree, because handling a dispute mediation properly matters and this totally independent of whether or not your words bind them all.
A lot of victims put their hope into you and if their cases are not properly handled, it frustrates them even more!
From my point of view, you have lost any credibility with not adding Stake's provably rigged in-house games to your list!
You also confirmed that you are not qualified to handle Stake's provably rigged in-house games properly:
Without much experience on this field [so my words can perhaps be treated as empty air], IMO the idea that originals being rigged can be somewhat thwarted.
You still misunderstood my answer. Kindly read again so you can grasp what I conveyed.
But, if I may suggest a better thing for you to spend your time, rather than trying to throw muds, perhaps it's better to write that thread about your situation, so it can be finally added to the list like you wanted it to be? And the overseers can pitch in right after that. I think that can be considered as using your time more wisely than what you're doing right now, because... I don't think any of that mud will stick.
If any, IMO, it'll just lower your credibility on overseers' eyes when they read through your posts when they read your case as they saw you spending your time balling some muds and grasping straws to build the strawman.
My two cents.