Quote from: Kavelj22 on January 09, 2025, 11:38:48 PM

Quote from: paxmao on January 09, 2025, 10:10:32 PM

Quote from: Kavelj22 on January 09, 2025, 08:22:48 PM

[...]

No one imagined that the regime in Syria would be so fragile that it allowed armed gangs to occupy more provinces, reaching Damascus, and then Assad would flee so quickly and without resistance.[...]

The regime is as strong as Ruzzia, as they were they only international backer. Most people on this thread are complaining about the new government - and there are certainly good reasons -but they are so biased that they forget to mention that Al-Asad's regime was pretty much a torturing machine that killed thousands of political prisoners.

There is no great and perfect solution for Syria, just trying to get the best possible from an ugly situation.

The success of these terrorist groups in reaching power does not mean at all that they are revolutionaries or that the revolution succeeded in achieving the goals for which it was established. Also, the dictatorship of the previous regime does not at all justify giving power to groups that were classified as terrorists. The Assad regime killed opponents and tortured protesters against its rule, and therefore it is the one that allowed foreign intervention since the opposition did not find anyone to contain it inside Syria, so they were forced to struggle in other countries. I support the revolution of the Syrian people who aspire to a better reality. However, if the dictatorship of the regime is used as a pretext to justify the atrocities that armed Takfiri groups have committed and are still committing, this is what will make everyone regret the rule of the Assad regime.

I am against foreign intervention in Syria, regardless of its source, and I am also against the practices of the Assad regime for more than 60 years. But this does not mean at all that I support terrorist militias and agents of external powers that want to divide the region and include Israel's right to attack everyone.

In an ideal world Syria would not need intervention. Syrians would all come to some short of agreement even creating regions or different countries, but we have to be realistic - the interests in the region are huge and that is simply not going to happen. The next best is at least have someone -even anyone - with proper control and law, even if it is a shitty government. Some countries have understood this and are providing temporary waivers to embargoes.