Quote from: mikeywith on Today at 09:43:27 PM

Quote from: yahoo62278 on December 31, 2024, 07:26:14 AM

Sections they frequent

Not this one, please. We don't want people spamming sections they know nothing about to enroll in certain campaigns.

In general, I think it would be best if every campaign manager prices users based on their own judgment without revealing why. Otherwise, you’ll start encouraging members to do things that could eventually have a net negative effect on the campaign and the forum as a whole.

I also think imposing a minimum number of posts per unit of time is a bad idea, the same as requiring users to post a certain number of posts in specific sections. Obviously, I am not a campaign manager, so I don't know what don't know, but as a member, I do not participate in campaigns that tell me to post a certain number of posts every week or in specific topics/sections. I’m fine with posts in certain sections not being counted, but I still want to post there. (I’ve seen one campaign forbid thier members from posting in certain sections before.)

Users are free to post wherever they want, but I am using certain criteria in order to best rate them at how useful they will be to a client. Users that post regularly in multiple sections hold more value to a company then users that only post in the altcoin section or whatnot.

I don't want users to just post everywhere hoping for a higher rating, I am actually looking at posts and seeing if the user is on topic, not repeating others, post makes sense etc and giving them a quality rating from 1-10. So far noone is above a 7.5 in total.

FYI, I am only rating those whom are applying to my campaigns ATM.