Quote from: EarnOnVictor on January 10, 2025, 12:00:17 PM

Quote from: Davidvictorson on December 19, 2024, 05:38:16 PM

-snip-
The gambler, rejected it. As he was gearing for full ecstasy. Alas! around 90+7mins, Santa Clara equalized and the game ended 1-1. He lost his $4, lost $746 and lost $444. Same old stories of gamblers and their greed or whatever other term they use to justify their behavior.

Kindly drop your thoughts and opinions.
Copied

Another pathetic gambling story!

I've always said that the cash-out feature is neutral, it's not a trap by the bookies as it can work for them or against them just as it can work for the gambler or against him depending on what the gambler decides. But for me, judging by my experience in trading which is one of the riskiest activities online, it's better to go for the "safe option" let's be reasonably "conservative" than being aggressive. This is especially important when there is a single game remaining. A little amount earned is better than losing.

If your gambling behavior is governed by your greed, this cash-out feature will always be neglected. You always aim for continuous profits and bigger winnings, until you completely forgot that you are gambling, and gambling does not guarantee constant profits and wins, or it could be winnings at first, the rest are massive losses. It’s only when you end up losing all your profits, you start to realized that you are supposed to cash out your profits, and not gamble them all.