Quote from: holydarkness on Today at 10:18:13 AM

Quote from: tetaeridanus on Today at 12:18:20 AM

Quote from: Saint-loup on January 08, 2025, 07:02:01 PM

I've seen your other post on Cinexrino's thread, I won't reply on both topics to say the same thing, especially overthere while I haven't posted before and I think it's a bit off-topic on top of that.
I saw this case (and the other ones from OP regarding this platform) were marked are closed and resolved in your lists, I was surprised since I still see OP posting angry messages and serious accusations against this casino here and in the ANN thread of the platform. So I looked at this topic and the other one regarding accusations of illegal activities in India, and I didn't find anything showing those accusations have been addressed and solved. I deduced from this, it was related in a way or another to the open conflict between you and him, and you've decided to close the case so as to not have to deal with him anymore. I guessed you've chosen the "resolved" option because you've considered having made enough for his cases, but unfortunately users having no clues about your conflict with him could think those accusations have really been adressed and won't bother to check by themselves further. So I suggested Kingbj21 to do the same as what Cinexrino did in order to signal his cases are still open and not addressed.

My case is also unadressed, hence I am trying to find a support on my flag to try to get to spotlight. I am getting muted in this forum since the day I have written about rollbit. I deserve my compansation but sadly “if razer doesn’t respond” or I don’t get enough support on my case; my case will be counted as resolved by holydarkness. Even if it isn’t.

Two things: one, it would be advisable to keep a discussion about your thread in your thread, we're going OOT here.

Two, I can understand that you're trying to get a support from someone who currently questioning how status are made on my list. Though IMHO you, accidentally or not, put me in a bad place and add more seasoning to the pot during your attempt, I would appreciate if you tell the current situation of your case as what really and currently happens.

holydarkness does not and will not count your case as resolved as per his sole decision, as what your paragraph seemingly try to depict. And yes, it isn't resolved, that's why he refused to comply to your original demand to mark it as unresolved because Rollbit's final call is not what you preferred it to be, despite my attempt to get it retried second time by contacting Razer about it, and third time while I once again reach him and wrote to ask for his re-re-reconsideration.

During this time, while we wait for Razer's reply, you wrote and asked for your case to be marked as unresolved because you believe that is the appropriate status, and I explained why I can't do that as well as --and this is the most important point-- I'll leave it to the DT to make the call. DT, through the flag. holydarkness is not the one who "count" it as resolved, he let the DT use their voting power through your flag.

Why one month? If you perhaps curious? It's because DT are usually rather quick to jump into action if they found and deemed a wrong has been made. You've announce your flag uhh... pretty much everywhere. I believe the DTs are already aware of it, some [if not most] already gave your whole situation a read, and if they deemed Rollbit is the one at fault here, they've most certainly already support your flag.

But, just in case that some are busy and wasn't able to read your whole situation yet or needed time to decide... end of January.

Rather different than what your post conveyed, isn't it?

Quote from: holydarkness on December 23, 2024, 09:59:05 AM

[...]

Quote from: tetaeridanus on December 22, 2024, 06:51:13 PM

[...]

Holydarkness, I have PM’d you.

Since you left my thread, what will be your update about this situation? My situation shouldn’t be “in progress” it should be unresolved.

Best regards.

And why should it be marked as unresolved? Because the case didn't end well from your side? If we may turn the situation, shouldn't the case be marked as "resolved", given they've gave you explanation, got it retried, gave you an even longer explanation that justify their action?

I am still with "in progress" due to what I show you on my last post on your thread. Depending on Razer's reply [or no reply], I'll wait for a month [suppose he stand firm with both of his feet] to see the general consensus of the DTs on your flag. And will mark the case according to their ruling. As I said, this thread is not authoritarian, it is not up to me to decide what status is on what case, nor the accuser's. It follows the forum's decision.

So, to make things simple, by January 31st, if the case is still open due to no-response from Razer, and your flag is active, which tell us that the DTs think you're the one being wronged here, I'll mark it as unresolved.

[...]

Hello holydarkness,

Two adress your two things;

One, it is correct that I should keep away from my disccussion in other topics however; just because 2 DTs opposed my flag it doesn’t change the fact that it is a solid argument or not. 2 of those DTs both didn’t even read my accusation; owlcatz didn’t even finish the first paragraph. He abused his DT power by admitting that he is opposing the flag because he believes I am a degenerate to open a huge position like that.

Secondly, DaveF gave examples from ToS which Rollbit already ‘accepted the terms ’ by compansating players which falsifies his whole argument of ToS which Rollbit lacks any responsibility.

My case is far from over, even if Razer admits or not.

You say 1 month rule is put by you; for what? To pressurise me to silence?

THIRDLY, you are taking everything personal; please don’t. My message is to the whole forum who went silent for my case. I have and had no intention to disrespect your actions in this forum and won’t have one.

Regards.