Quote from: tetaeridanus on Today at 11:41:35 AM

Hello holydarkness,

Two adress your two things;

One, it is correct that I should keep away from my disccussion in other topics however; just because 2 DTs opposed my flag it doesn’t change the fact that it is a solid argument or not. 2 of those DTs both didn’t even read my accusation; owlcatz didn’t even finish the first paragraph. He abused his DT power by admitting that he is opposing the flag because he believes I am a degenerate to open a huge position like that.

Secondly, DaveF gave examples from ToS which Rollbit already ‘accepted the terms ’ by compansating players which falsifies his whole argument of ToS which Rollbit lacks any responsibility.

My case is far from over, even if Razer admits or not.

You say 1 month rule is put by you; for what? To pressurise me to silence?

THIRDLY, you are taking everything personal; please don’t. My message is to the whole forum who went silent for my case. I have and had no intention to disrespect your actions in this forum and won’t have one.

Flag has nothing to do with a case being resolved or not. That flag was opened by me to spread awareness on my case and rollbit. If you deem to act on it, you should demand every accuser to open flag and wait for it to solve; to finalize a case as resolved or unresolved. I have seen a few flags here. Please go ahead to my threads and count the supporters and a few ‘fake’ opposers.

Altough we had our differences, your friend AHOYBRAUSE said;

Quote

Hmm, not a fan of this user (sorry, but I am honest) but these words are actually on point and describe this whole dilemma perfectly.
If you offer something like trading an so on you simply can't make a short notice maintenance and strip the user of their ability to actually trade, there is no excuse for that. You either announce it before hand (not just 10min) or you simply stop the possibility to trade a fixed time before the maintenance starts so that no user has a disadvantage.
Of course he is asking for a reimbursement, I don't understand why there is even a discussion about that. Ignoring him is such a bad example and not acceptable. I hope this gets resolved but looking at the history of replies from Razor in this forum I wouldn't count on it.

He was talking about Blossom15’s comment. This summarizes everything perfectly.

I thank AHOYBRAUSE for his genuine comment, I have found in my original Maintenance Scam thread.

That’s why I opened a new thread about it. To summarize. As Shirshir99 said in my last post; No one is reading long texts.

People can oppose or not support the flag and still believe I deserve compansation. If you make my case unresolved due to the flag, you will silence me; which makes Saint-Loup’s opinion valid.

As we are on an agreement that the discussion about your situation should be keep in your own thread and away from other topic, I hope we can reach a mutual understanding that this is [hopefully] the last time I address your matter here or other threads about other matters [of someone else's, just to be clear] and will continue the topic on your own thread, as I have to say that though this is where we should end our talk about your issue, some matters are indeed interesting and need to be addressed. So, I'll jump to your thread right after this, only finishing out one or two matter here, as they do belong to this thread, to clear the air.

The thing I want to dissect here to leave no room for any doubt or other people to twist into a different narrative is the one month "rule", as it is actually not a rule and I am not "placing" it as a means like you perceived; to pressurize you. I've covered the reason of this "timer" on previous post, if I may quote myself,

Quote from: holydarkness on Today at 10:18:13 AM

[...]
Why one month? If you perhaps curious? It's because DT are usually rather quick to jump into action if they found and deemed a wrong has been made. You've announce your flag uhh... pretty much everywhere. I believe the DTs are already aware of it, some [if not most] already gave your whole situation a read, and if they deemed Rollbit is the one at fault here, they've most certainly already support your flag.[...]

To further emphasize, DT are usually quick [yet thoughtful] in taking action against or in favor to a flag. Especially when that flag has been announced on Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here!, as yours did.

Given you've also create your own thread on repu to announce the flag and request for support, I think it's safe to say most of the DT are already aware of your flag. The low traction [as I've mentioned somewhere in the past] is probably because they choose to abstain, because --like me-- they can see from both perspective for this case, and they can't support or oppose the flag as it'll violate the clause they entered upon taking action for that flag.

With this in mind, would it not be valid to question what is the proper timeline to wait for other DT to notice, to decide, and to take action? One month? One year? One week? Thus, the safest period that crossed my mind was one month [one and a half month, give or take couple of days, to be exact]. And that is not to pressurize you, it is simply because I am failed to see what would two or three months or one semester would do, if most of the DTs have already made their decision.

It'll just put you in a misery of waiting and hoping for more support [suppose the flag does not go active].

So, why do we need to inflict that while one month is "enough"? And we can close it, for your sake, so you can start taking a path of closure.

Hopefully you can see what I had in my mind when I proposed it.

If... by some miracle, or as fate will it, a new evidence or incriminating situation arise or other case happen that make the DTs reconsider the old flag that you raised in the past, that they did not support because they couldn't at that time but can at that future time due to the development of the situation, you can always nudge me.