Nothing you've said in your last post has explaned why SmokerFace sent you the BTC, as I asked prior. It's key to understanding your relationship with SmokerFace and your defense, in my opinion. I'd suggest using less words and talking about irrelevant topics, and just answering the question bluntly.
No.
Blockchain evidence doesn't prove me being Smokerface
You've admitted to having ownership of
bc1qcvdfnn0c06dewqtexjlev9z4nspwku5kat4wd9I don't remember how I traded it, but most likely,
yes not (bc1qjrjvr3a20rhf7vqdr2rvcexx28j3d8e7plyje9) | This one I own: bc1qcvdfnn0c06dewqtexjlev9z4nspwku5kat4wd9) (The one smokerface sent to). (Look at the justification below to clear your mind, too)
This is how I see it going through:
bc1qjrjvr3a20rhf7vqdr2rvcexx28j3d8e7plyje9 (Smokerface) -> bc1qcvdfnn0c06dewqtexjlev9z4nspwku5kat4wd9 (My wallet) -> 3EUhPUmdDcck8MeGSoBoPzRVSjDAZVdh68 (My exchange, service, p2p)
If I am intentionally not being targeted, everything should be clear now, and people who gave me Negative for my Smokerface being my alt should revert their feedback.
Can we not consider "probable certainty" but use feedback on 100% certainty in blockchain cases?
Trust is not based on certainty or fact, especially here in bitcointalk. Go and look at my profile for example, where JollyGood says that I applied for a campaign for a scam mixer "whilst knowing it was a scam" when my judgement on it
probably being a scam came many months after I applied for the campaign. Does that mean it will get removed? no. Or, go look at icopress's feedback on me, where he calls me a troll, then go look at all of my posts and tell me if that matches who I am on this forum. Is that fact or certainty? No...just a butt-hurt user that someone called them out for somewhat shady practices.
The difference between my feedbacks and yours however, is that blockchain evidence is suggesting that you are connected with SmokerFace, which is enough reason not to trust you. So far, nothing you have said has overpowered the blockchain evidence that you are both connected, and are very likely to be the same person. I'm trying to offer you the opportunity to give some reasonable explanations (such as, what the transaction between SmokerFace and yourself was), however so far you are passing up that opportunity with quite irrelevant jibber jabber in my opinion.