If you wanted ChatGPT to chime in on our debate about wether all value is subjective or not, then you likely have to reformulate your question, and it could take several attempts before you might start to feel that ChatGBT is getting closer to the essence of being able to answer the question in a meaningful (rather than gobble-dee-gook and superficial) kind of way.

In this thread we were not really talking about true value, even though sure, true value (and intrinsic and objective value) were parts of the discussion, since largely Richy_T was proclaiming that the ONLY value is subjective value, so he is almost denying the existence of objective, intrinsic value and perhaps even suggesting that the concept of value in itself has no meaning unless it is tied back to subjective value.

Of course, he is also suggesting that I am a wee bit too unenlightened to understand my lack of insight into what is the crux of the matter, and I am not going to proclaim to be some kind of an expert beyond my own visceral reaction to his suggestion that "all value" is subjective...which comes off as a wee bit too much relativism woo woo from my own potentially naive perspective.


Reminds me of the classic young bull / old bull joke.

>>>>"A young bull and an old bull are at the top of a hill.

There are hundreds of cows grazing below. The young bull says, "Let's run down there and fuck a cow!"

The old bull says, "No, let's walk down and fuck them all."<<<<<<

https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/1hrnja/a_young_bull_and_an_old_bull_are_at_the_top_of_a/


That is a retarded assertion.  Of course, I have heard that kind of a statement plenty of times in my life. 

To me, it sounds like what a young person would say.. and/or a retarded (out of touch) old person.