Surely that is a fair way of framing Saylor's perspective that also helps to align him with quite a few other longer term bitcoiners (not that you have to be longer term in order to start to grasp the  "no top" idea).    Another funny thing about his perspective is that he says it out loud and a large number of people consider him as a kind of looney...  .. so he says it out loud, and some of us can relate more than others - not that any of us are going to see bitcoin in any kind of exactly similar way.


I doubt that your proclamation has much significance.  Sure you could end up being correct, but so what?

I would place slightly less than 50% odds that we don't go below $90k ever again (spot price on Bitstamp, right?).  I am not even sure if I would be willing to bet my own  50/50 or less than 50/50 feelings.. which that I think that there are greater than 50% odds  that we go below $90k again at some point...

To me, it seems to become bettable when you are giving 100% assurances or something close to high assurances that we are never going to below $90k again.. then that seems like a bit too much certainty, then you should be willing to give high odds on a bet like that, too.  especially since you are so confident, right?  I doubt that you would even give 90% odds on your statement.  which means that I would ONLY have to bet 1/10 the amount  that you would have to bet.. something like that...because you are the one expressing so much confidence on your assertion.


Yeah, but why you talking about ethereum in this thread?   Why should we give any shits about retarded shitcoining that is going on?  And when you said that Blackrock bought $249 million in BTC, are you merely talking about their ETF buys?  They are buying and selling BTC based on client's buying and/or selling ETF shares, so they have to back up their  ETF shares with actual bitcoin when the buys of black rock BTC spot ETF shares out pace the selling of those shares.