Its not his fault as he doesn't even have a trust list. I'm just not a fan of accounts less than a year old being on DT. It should take much longer for one to prove themselves and their intentions than that. Not his fault he was added to DT2, though.
Thanks for mentioning it twice.

But again I still do not see my fault, apart from that I am not aware of another trust apart from which reflects on everyone's profile.
just give AI credit where its due so as not to misrepresent yourself and your abilities.
Exactly, but when you see experienced members posting AI garbage or newbies trying to farm/rank up solely using AI. You (we) need to tag them but honestly, we do not have enough awareness (especially on local boards) and our tools are also becoming less effective (sorry for repeating that but it is the crux).
I am very much aware of what AI is doing to our schools and my country's education system. Most of the graduates are not even able to write one paragraph on their own and the situation is becoming worse. I also tried to post that in your thread but it got deleted by mods;

I am passionate about this and trying to make it more effective, that is the whole reason for starting this thread.
not that I am absolutely claiming that you are licking his ass because he distrust you. But yes, feedback is one thing and trust lists are another.
Whether it's because of that or not it still sounds the same to me.
If you reread my answer to you, I said that I am not even aware of why you are accusing me of ass-licking. Then, as I got informed of a whole another layer of trust system, I tried to understand your position, and again you are blaming me that I have implied that, No, I said ' Now, I am getting why he is thinking so.
And frankly, I am not even mad at you as we are in a public discourse and it is meant to happen but it will be better if you focus on the theme.
In fact I have reviewed his feedback (they are "aggressive", my style)
I do not even know when I was on DT or not DT, BUT, my trust feedback has always been of the same importance since the beginning.
Being against AI today is like being against the internet in 2000 or being against bitcoin in 2015. And this forum was born on the internet and for bitcoin.
What are you talking about? It seems you are not even aware of the microscopic details we care about when we tag someone for AI abuse. Please have a look at the thread. I know it needs serious brainstorming but you will find our approach towards AI there.
I guess we have a similar stance but from different points of view.
In what sense is your view different? if your stance is the same

. I mean,
I want to know, what exactly are your objections about the thread?