Nutildah why did you ignore this? I used AI ofc, and alot others are using.Our taxes are going to be invested in AI.
It comes off as insincere. Its like you presented ChatGPT with your side of the story and then asked it to generate a list of things you could complain about. I think what tipped me toward leaving you the negative tag is your failure to address Kirito89's request to submit your complaint to AskGamblers. Is there any valid reason for not doing this? They are proper, well-respected mediators after all, and we are not. If the final outcome of your complaint to AG is favorable to you, or even undecided, I will remove the tag on your account. Right now it just seems like you're one of several blackmailers currently plaguing the forum.
This is what I was waiting for, because I have provided every single piece of evidence Holydarknes asked for, and later he will ignore it and move to other things. I have filed a complaint and will update you once I get any. I hope you will not jump into other things like Holydarknees & Kirito89
The necessity to straighten the narrative need to be done to minimize the spread area and severity of the smoke screen. Your evidences were not ignored, redirected to AG. It's been the mutual understanding since you propose it and the second party [DuckDice via Kirito89] agreed.
So far, the other topic that become the entree of this topic has been repetitively explained to you and it was proven that your skull seemingly made of diamond, hard and refracting light shone upon it into many facets. The tangle of previous matters of fairness seems to become irrelevant here and has to be tabled as you insist on playing on one specific angle, the one you think you've got your smoking gun, that Kirito89 did not provide proof here even after you gave your permission.
The reason for this has been explained several posts above, I am sure, I'm just too lazy to dig as I know it won't matter to you. Even with your permission, DuckDice corporation itself, with their customer privacy agreement and other things, would prevent Kirito89 from publishing here. No, I am not ignoring your proof and/or not asking Kirito for his proof.
I chase this path to validate the issue [the one that should be minor but turn to be major] so we can go back to the fairness question soonest possible, but later you choose a more viable way to get it validated, through ADR, where DuckDice will minimize the possible violation in any of GDPR article and the validator couldn't be more neutral and well-equipped in verifying things, in case someone will later accuse the mediator sided with casino [suppose the validation made here in the forum, by us]. So, AG is the perfect path, that you suggested yourself, which DuckDice agreed.
To summarize, all these past two or three weeks, it's about waiting for you to escalate to AG as you wished yourself, then we can get things back in motion.
And rest assuread, in many cases, we respected the ADR's verdict, so no one would jump into their own conclusion, but rather compliant to what the arbitrator dictate. Could you, though?