Nutildah why did you ignore this?
Over the last few months I've noticed a spate of AI-generated complaints against casinos. When the problems these accounts have are explained to them by a forum member or casino representative, they either shift the nature of the complaint, add a bunch of unrelated information, or continue pounding on the same fallacy-laden argument (ala game-protect aka BlackyJacky). While of course some casino complaints are legitimate, I've found that 100% of the ones using AI are not. In short, a pattern seems to be emerging here (use AI to throw shit against the wall & see what sticks).
I want to assure you with all my soul that it was not me who shift the focus from the main issue, I never expected them to blackmail me .I would like to emphasize that throughout the entire time, I was the one asking him not to shift the focus away from the main issue. I repeatedly told him to stop making accusations and to concentrate on the issue I had raised. But he twisted it. Below are my responses, where I clearly told him and requested him not to divert attention from the main issue with those baseless allegations.
1.
my intention remains unchanged to share my personal experience and raise awareness about the issues i encountered with duckdice.io. i encourage you to focus on investigating my original concerns rather than conflating them with unrelated actions from other individuals.[/color]
2.
I hope we can now focus on the concerns i initially raised regarding the extraordinary losing streak and the fairness mechanisms in place.
Looking forward to your response.
3.
I want to emphasize that I have never contacted your team to demand money or bonuses, and I urge you to stop bringing up unrelated accusations to divert attention from this issue. While your provably fair system may work theoretcally, these inconsistencies and reports from other users suggest possible manipulation within your platform, and I stand by my concerns, seeking clarity on these issues.
4.
Stop making baseless accusations. I have already made it clear that I do not want you to pay anyone a single penny, and I stand by that.
This kind of response only further damages Duckdice's reputation, as it shows the unprofessionalism of its representatives. To clear everything up, I will share the email conversation between your team and me, so everyone can see the truth for themselves.Here's the link: https://imgur.com/a/ZbWExwU 5.
It’s clear you’re grasping at straws. Only a mindless scammer would create an email with the same name as mine to get something from you.
I’ve already stated very clearly before: I never demanded money. What I have always asked for is fairness—something you’ve repeatedly avoided while coming back here with irrelevant claims that make no sense.
Even a kid could understand that using the same username for two accounts would never work in anyone’s favor at the same time. Your accusations are baseless and a poor attempt to shift attention away from the actual issues. Focus on addressing the real problems instead of spinning these pointless stories.
6.
Deflecting from the Core Issue:
It’s evident that you’re using this fabricated blackmail narrative to divert attention from the real issue—my concerns about unfair betting outcomes and your refusal to provide transparent data. This is a blatant attempt to tarnish my credibility and distract readers from DuckDice.io’s questionable practices.
7.
Regarding your claims about the so-called “blackmailer” emails, let me clarify something you keep twisting: I never stated it was a coincidence that you received emails from scammers with an email address similar to mine. What I said was that the scammer used my username, as clearly shown in the screenshot of the email you posted earlier. It’s you who keeps changing the narrative to suit your claims. You seem to conveniently ignore this distinction to push your baseless accusations against me.
8.
Additionally, I want the Bitcointalk community to witness what Duckdice representatives are doing in public forums—constantly shifting narratives, twisting facts, and making baseless accusations. If this is how they handle public discussions, it makes me wonder: what are they doing in private messages with users? How far does this behavior go when there’s no public scrutiny?
9.
Since I have already shared the relevant information publicly, it’s no longer an issue if Kirito89 decides to DM that information to you or anyone else. Transparency is my priority in this matter, and I hope this clears up any ambiguity.
Was it me who shifted the narrative? No. I begged him not to do this. I even asked Kirito89, "Is it a coincidence that whenever someone raises an issue against you in public forums, you start receiving those so called "blackmail emails"? Or is it just a way to weaken the claims of the person speaking out?" Yet, he didn’t respond to that.