Quote from: Wiwo on February 23, 2025, 09:39:14 PM

Quote from: CryptSafe on February 20, 2025, 02:41:24 PM

Quote from: Pandu Geddon on February 20, 2025, 05:55:29 AM

I also thought it was a statistic of the number of users who registered Betkin accounts, not active customers who played. One of them might be the impact of their signature campaign launch. I'm sure it's quite a lot of users if you see there are quite a lot of participants who register.

I created an account here some time ago, but I always see users who are online at different times, which is not enough. From the statistics shared, there may not be half. At least, that's what I see.

I believe what you have said is the logic behind the casino population increase in the registered number of users as the campaign manager spelled it out that applicants ought to register on the casino website to be eligible and the campaign got lots of applicants who applied and I for sure know it is as a result of the signature campaign here that they got that traffic which makes it visibly clear for all to see the benefits of signature campaign for organisations here on this platform. The statistics is a proof that campaigns are really worth it.

One thing we should note is that, when a casino lunch its signatures campaign here in this forum, within the next few days into the campaign launch there will be a high inflow of customers into that casino and the overall traffic on that casino at that point will increase, this is what we have to know and this is a natural occurrence in most cases.

Promotions come in many phases and if Betkin wants to even increase its number of active players and new registrations it can run a review campaign, this is the fastest way to get people to register and play one or two games on that casino.

It is a normal thing that casinos experience high traffic upon launch of signature campaign because that is one of the reasons why the casino took such step. Not only that, signature campaigns gives members the sense of safety because casinos that run campaigns would definitely have good customer service which is amongst the reasons why the do such.

For a casino to run a campaign on this platform, they are guaranteeing the platform members that they're genuine and have legal privilege to operate wherever they are located except for the decentralised casinos and this is the reason why they get traffic from this platform.

Already, they have a running campaign, I think that would serve a good purpose for them rather than running a review again which I think it is not really good looking at the fact that they have an ongoing signature campaign
Do you not think it would involve them more money to running the review when they already have an ongoing signature campaign?.