Girona have a long streak of dry defeats against Real, so this pick was logical.
But WTF, what kind of multi-bet is this?!

It just seems to me that if Real scores a goal first (second option) and Girona doesn't score a goal (third option), then this means an automatic victory for Real (first option). But in this case, the first option is simply unnecessary and if it increases the odds, then this is a clear mistake by the bookmaker.
The odds increase, but so do the chances of losing.

No they don't!
If bet 2 wins means Real scored, if bet 3 wins means Girona hasn't scored a goal, the automatically bet 1 is a winner.
I'm really curious how was this possible as you can't even select multiple options from the same event.
By the way, I checked it myself, the odds do not change if you add option 1 to options 2 and 3. Moreover, if you choose the opponent's victory instead of the first option, the bookmaker simply does not allow you to place a bet and writes something like "this set of outcomes is impossible".
Therefore, from a mathematical point of view, everything is correct there, but I don’t quite understand why in the betting constructor you can add outcomes that do not increase the odds (in fact, they are a duplication of other picks).