Quote from: Odohu on Today at 03:13:35 AM

If I may ask, why putting threads of issues that were successfully resolved? Don'tyou think that adding them might mean that BC.Game actually solve issues and claims that are legitimate thereby making this post and your actions out of place?

Quote from: God Of Thunder on Today at 05:09:40 AM

At least eight of those threads' titles contain the world Solved, and I believe a couple more were solved, but the OP did not update the thread title. I understand that you wanted to mention how many scam accusations are raised against a specific casino. Is it alarming? I think so. I have been criticizing the BC game for their worst support. Most of these scam accusations wouldn't even be created if their support did not copy-paste pre-generated text from their support software. They barely read what the players write to them.

Considering the free service holy darkness provides and the number of cases he resolved, I believe it's just a pure failure of their support. I still believe the casino does not intend to scam people. But they have to work on their support, and they have room to improve.

The argument that "most of these are solved" are irrelevant. The main point is that BC.Game prey on those who do not post about their negative experience and who accept that they have been scammed and move on. Some people value their privacy and will not conduct KYC. Some are consumed or busy with their lives and do not want to fight online in attempt to get their funds back, or don't fight as they believe they have no voice. Some people don't even know there is a forum or avenue to post on to get their money back. So what, some are solved, what about the ones that aren't that we do not know about? Can anyone really confidently say that the ones that are resolved are 100% of the instances where players lost their funds? Isn't the fact that people had issues alone or this kind of practice of forcing people to post publicly to get their funds back a non-trustworthy practice? I believe it's not trustworthy and that there are many victims without a voice.

I also believe that holydarkness is not a random good Samaritan. There is incentive or motivation for him to do what he does from another party. I welcome him to publicly deny this officially for the record.

Quote from: Helena Yu on Today at 04:03:00 AM

There was a similar discussion and I will quote the most merited post.

Quote from: suchmoon on January 18, 2025, 10:22:47 PM

It's just like any other deal. You have a promise to pay and a risk of not getting paid. Like e.g. if you buy a trinket and risk that the seller won't deliver. Nothing wrong with positive trust here, if it's not extorted/solicited/begged/reciprocated etc.

Edit: another way to look at it - if the opposite happened, i.e. campaign manager didn't pay on time/correctly/etc, would they get a type 2/3 flag (contract violation). If so, then positive trust rating for paying on time/correctly/etc is justified IMO.

This mean most people agree if someone left positive feedback even it's "free money" by your own definition, because when people are participating in contest, they also carry the same risk that Bc.game will not give the reward. You know, it's possible to run a contest and the sponsor can accuse or doing anything in order to not give the reward.

This is a poor reason to give positive trust. So does that mean that I can run contests and giveaways in order to build my trust here? No, it should not mean that. There is no risk participating in a giveaway or a post, and it is not a trustworthy action to give away money or to sponsor something...for this reason is why so much corruption exists in the world through political donations and lobbying. Is that the same kind of system that this community should follow?

Quote from: Odohu on Today at 03:13:35 AM

Secondly, are you sure that you have done your background checks properly to confirm that all the people you listed, who have given positive trust ratings to BC.Game, have been given financial favours by the casinos? Don't you think some might trust the casino based on their experience with the casino and the ability to make hitch free gambling and withdrawal from the casino? If, by chance, I happen to win a huge amount of money from BC.Game and got my withdrawal processed, are you saying that if I drop positive rating, you will add me to your distrust list? Well, I will like to get your answer. But i know for sure that you have right to trust or distrust anyone based on your personal conviction and conscience and so does others and using a list of scam accusations that some are actually resolved, to draw conclusion may leave a lot of question marks.

Finally, most of the popular casinos have series of scam accusations, with some resolved and others pending just like the list you posted, so I don't know why you think its perculiar to BC.Game.

NB: I'm not advocating for BC.Game neither am I in anyway supporting your position, I just made my points from the angle of someone that seeks clarifications.

A casino (or any service for that matter) is obligated to provide a 100% legitimate service. BC.game is far from that description. It does not matter if there are players who use the casino with no trouble, if there are a group of people who become a victim. I think it is irresponsible for someone who is a part of DT to leave a positive trust rating for a casino that consistently has issues with their players, and where the question of "how many victims are there without a voice?" remains a very legitimate question. For this reason, I distrust anyone who is giving positive trust ratings to this casino, as they are not giving trust ratings to people or entities who have flawless, trustworthy reputations, but they are are giving positive trust ratings to people or entities who are leveraging advertising and their perceived trustworthiness to lure and damage a select group of people who do not use their voice.

Quote from: willi9974 on Today at 06:14:00 AM

I made custom Btc Coin and Aluminium cards for bc.game and all works very fine. Good communication in the Design and Production Phase. They make free raffles with all the cards. So all was very good in my small sector and contact point.

You should remove the solved topics in your or let it better in, so every can see bc.game is working on some topics and it is not all black what you see.

Switch my trust topic to neutral so long so many open Problems.

Best regards,
Willi

I will further refine both the thread and the trust selections over time, separating the unresolved from the resolved and also add commentary so that the reader can distinguish or gauge the legitimacy of any unresolved cases without investigating for themselves. For now, the purpose of listing all threads is simple - whether issues are resolved or not, there were issues, and there isn't just one or two, there are tens, maybe hundreds if I counted past 15 pages...and as mentioned earlier in this post, the very legitimate question is "how many victims are there without a voice?".

I appreciate that you've done the responsible thing and have changed the rating to neutral. In fact, yours was one of the few where you had actually provided something in a transaction (and did not just receive free money in a contest or something of the like), so really your rating is somewhat fine and I would have removed you from my distrust list anyway after refinement. I have removed you from my distrust list now and changed it to trustworthy, as what you have done is a trustworthy thing to do - to not give positive trust to an entity that is clearly causing problems for many people. - and I believe everyone should be following this practice, and that it's the responsible thing to do with DT power.