[...]
[...]
I also believe that holydarkness is not a random good Samaritan. There is incentive or motivation for him to do what he does from another party. I welcome him to publicly deny this officially for the record.
[...]
First of all, allow me to extend my deepest sympathy. Truly. It seems you're so much damaged and betrayed by the world that you find and perceive kindness and sincerity as rare as a unicorn with a mermaid tail flying above Avengers Tower.
That said, would you want to extend that question with other casinos too? Or is it strictly limited to BC?
Sportsbet? DuckDice? FortuneJack? Shuffle? Because I have their contacts too and they're one chat away from a discussion about cases, just like BC. Oh, Rollbit too, since I recently acquired their rep's personal contact.
How about
Joya v. lightbet, since I even go to a length to get their attention, though the situation ended unresolved. But looking at how I exhaust a lot of effort to get them to address the matter, certainly the "incentive or motivation" is greater than what's with BC, who reachable through an instant app.
While we're at it, how about
Roobet? I went far and deep to establish a contact, from reaching some contact, to reaching their live support, to emailing their support team as suggested, and repeating the process to other division as they dumped the situation to that division and they required me to explain from the beginning again.
Duelbits? I have email correspondencies with their rep to prove that I went to a length to get to the bottom of a case.
I don't have any intention to write this as a means to brag, simply to give an explicit picture of how I went deep on so many cases across casinos, not just BC. So, do you want to extend that question with those casinos too? And others that I don't bother to mention as it's in a distant past [and mentioning all of them would just make me sound like bragging]
[...]
You've wasted a lot of time in this post...you've made a lot of statements about connections to casinos, but did not once publicly deny that what you do is nothing more than charitable, and that you receive no incentive from
casinos to do so (in other words, you work for the casinos, as a bridge between them and the people - you are paid to do damage control) - again, welcoming you to publicly and officially deny this on the record. I doubt you will.
Well, I actually need that to be very clear, for what I'll propose next, in regards to "publicly and officially deny" on the record... as I've made it quite abundance in many occasions, yet people keep questioning that. I need to be sure if you're referring to BC or all of the casinos mentioned and not mentioned on my above post.
Given you mention the plural, I'll guess it's safe to assume we're going with all of the casinos, that you accuse me of getting incentives from casinos for the work I've done.
Factually, I've addressed this several times on several occasions, but at this point, I am a bit tired and sick of the rambling of those people who can't appreciate a "Samaritan" work, of how many hours I pour to help others that at times need to take my own personal time, and I wanted to... play, so here's my counter proposal for your challenge for me to publicly and officially deny that I get incentivized for solving cases on the record:
This is the written ageement we'll enter, read carefully and give your consent, as your consent or non-consent is the answer of your own challenge:
"I,
holydarkness, will give you,
BenCodie, until end of this month,
28th of February 2025, to prove that I,
holydarkness get incentivized by
any casino for
resolving cases and acting as bridge between the casinos and people.
Should you,
BenCodie, successfully to prove that I,
holydarkness, getting incentivized by casinos, I,
holydarkness will accept the punishment that the forum deemed necessary, be it negative feedback or flags or both, as well as will pay you,
BenCodie,
USD 5,000 for your effort to unearth the misdeed that I,
holydarknes, has done all this years.
IF you,
BenCodie, failed to provide necessary and solid-based evidence of said accusation before
28th of February 2025 though, you,
BenCodie, shall pay me,
holydarknes USD 50,000 for the inconvenience you,
BenCodie caused to me,
holydarkness, that I,
holydarkness perceived as a smear campaign and libel attempt."
Do we have a deal?