Quote from: BenCodie on Today at 08:17:09 PM

Quote from: holydarkness on Today at 07:03:48 PM

[...]

This is the written ageement we'll enter, read carefully and give your consent, as your consent or non-consent is the answer of your own challenge:

"I, holydarkness, will give you, BenCodie, until end of this month, 28th of February 2025, to prove that I, holydarkness, get incentivized by any casino for resolving cases and acting as bridge between the casinos and people.

Should you, BenCodie, successfully prove that I, holydarkness, getting incentivized by casinos, I, holydarkness, will accept the punishment that the forum deemed necessary, be it negative feedback or flags or both, as well as will pay you, BenCodie, USD 5,000 for your effort to unearth the misdeed that I, holydarkness, has done all this years.

IF you, BenCodie, failed to provide necessary and solid-based evidence of said accusation before 28th of February 2025 though, you, BenCodie, shall pay me, holydarkness, USD 50,000 for the inconvenience you, BenCodie, caused to me, holydarkness, that I, holydarkness, perceived as a smear campaign and libel attempt."

Do we have a deal?

Edit: oh, I have no interest to wait for your agreement by 28th, where you can just back down on the last second when you realized you're neck deep in shit. So, I give you until 23:59:59 forum time to give your answer. Should you agree, I'll need you to escrow the fund to a trusted escrow provider [I shall do that too]. Should you disagree, then kindly make a thoughtful and sincere public apology for throwing baseless accusation, with a commitment that should you ever question the "Samaritan" work I do, anyone are free to leave you tag or flag, since you backed down from your own commitment made today and the acknowledgement that also made today by backing up from the agreement by giving your non-consent, that I never get incentivized by casinos for the work I did bridging them and their players and get things resolved. Thus, your trustworthiness may be questioned.

Should you give no answer by 23:59:59, today, we shall conclude that you choose to back up from the deep shit you put yourself into.

Yes, you have freedom of speech, you're entitled to speak freely, but you have to remember that freedom of speech does not equal to freedom from consequences.

I originally stated that you are welcome to plainly, simply and clearly state that you do not receive an incentive to do what you do for casinos.

Quote from: BenCodie on Today at 06:24:07 AM

I also believe that holydarkness is not a random good Samaritan. There is incentive or motivation for him to do what he does from another party. I welcome him to publicly deny this officially for the record.

All that you needed to reply from the beginning in response was something like this:
I, holydarkness, am a good Samaritan who does not receive any form of incentive or motivation to communicate with casinos to resolve scam accusations for users..

The incentive being outside of the signature campaign (if that wasn't already obvious)

As for my second statement, what I had put in brackets was an alternative way of wording what you have not publicly denied (that what you do is nothing more than charitable, and that you receive no incentive from casinos - alternatively phrased (or, in other words) that you work for the casinos as a bridge between them and the people - you are paid to do damage control:

Quote from: BenCodie on Today at 06:30:51 PM

You've wasted a lot of time in this post...you've made a lot of statements about connections to casinos, but did not once publicly deny that what you do is nothing more than charitable, and that you receive no incentive from casinos to do so (in other words, you work for the casinos, as a bridge between them and the people - you are paid to do damage control) - again, welcoming you to publicly and officially deny this on the record. I doubt you will.

I am obviously not interested in your bet as I don't have access to your private communications (which even so, messages can be deleted) nor do I have access to your wallets (also can be deleted). I have only been interested in a sentence along the lines of:
I, holydarkness, am a good Samaritan who does not receive any form of incentive or motivation to communicate with casinos to resolve scam accusations for users.

Since I mentioned you. Not sure what the problem is with welcome you to post something so simple...I personally would have accepted that, as putting something in clear writing is something that a lot of guilty people around here tend to avoid doing. I have not actually accused you of any wrongdoing if you correctly read my posts, only stated my belief and provided alternative wording, with a welcome for you to clearly deny it.

[...]

[Disclaimer: I always try my best not to swear with full heart and seriousness, to face situations on the forum with cool and level headedness, walking away for fresh air when things became incredibly stupid. This time though, I'll let go and express myself as some people needs to be pulled out from the dream world they're living in. So, my apology in advance if anybody find this post explosive or excessive or inappropriate --not you, BenCodie, I am referring to others who unfortunate enought to have to read this filthy post.]

You seemed very confident and mighty before, by criticizing my post, when all I tried was to be thorough before I complied to your request and upped the ante to make it more formal and serious. You even emphasizing the chance of me addressing the matter as per what I marked in red,

Quote from: BenCodie on Today at 06:30:51 PM

You've wasted a lot of time in this post...you've made a lot of statements about connections to casinos, but did not once publicly deny that what you do is nothing more than charitable, and that you receive no incentive from casinos to do so (in other words, you work for the casinos, as a bridge between them and the people - you are paid to do damage control) - again, welcoming you to publicly and officially deny this on the record. I doubt you will.

And when things become real, where push become shove, and reality slapped you so hard in your face that your eyes watered, that freedom of speech does not come with freedom from consequences, your tail tucked between your leg so quickly.

Does this mean it is safe for all of us to conclude that you're all bark and no bites? That you can talk the talk, but when it comes to the walk, you're limping?

To respond to your post, no, I will not just simply said, "I, holydarkness, am a good Samaritan who does not receive any form of incentive or motivation to communicate with casinos to resolve scam accusations for users," and let it go.

What good shall it bring? People asked so many times, I patiently tell them that I am not, but that they're free to prove otherwise, yet it kept being asked over and over and over. Imagine being someone who spent a lot of time, literally handling situation and trying to help as many sides as I can, and the "pay back" I get was a fuckin shit trying to paint me as bad and question my sincerity by challenging me, welcoming me to publicly deny that I got incentivized, even upped the ante by doubting I will publicly address the matter. So this is me addressing it, just as you demanded by letting myself introduce you to real world and the definition of consequences:

Either you accept the deal, and start investigating me, my wallet address is there, it's a readily available information, if you can't find it, it means your intelligence is far lower than what you tried to cast to the public, but fret not, you should only ask and I will gladly provide it for you. And it can't be deleted [not sure where you get that idea, that "[...] wallet (also can be deleted)"]. Blockchain is there, and will stays there no matter what, I don't think anyone has control over what's shown and not shown on Blockchain, thus it can't be deleted. SMH.

You won't need to see my private communications, since if I do get paid by casinos, the damning proof will be there in the Blockchain, not in the conversation.

Or, back down from your own challenge, admit that you run your mouth too wide and you bite more than you can chew, that there are chances that you made post without thorough thinking, just a feigned intelligence, as when you're asked to prove your own accusation, it's all suddenly a tucked tail. It's ok, us the forum users are begin to get used with snowflakes. You're free to back down and disagree from the counter-challenge I propose.

But since you disagree, then, to quote myself, "kindly make a thoughtful and sincere public apology for throwing baseless accusation, with a commitment that should you ever question the "Samaritan" work I do, anyone are free to leave you tag or flag, since you backed down from your own commitment made today and the acknowledgement that also made today by backing up from the agreement by giving your non-consent, that I never get incentivized by casinos for the work I did bridging them and their players and get things resolved. Thus, your trustworthiness may be questioned."

If you can't be man enough to accept the deal that you started yourself, then at least be a boy enough to accept the consequences of that freedom of speech.

Two hours and forty minutes. Tick tock.