Quote from: SamReomo on February 26, 2025, 05:45:11 PM

Quote from: iv4n on February 24, 2025, 06:55:40 AM

Galactix has some restrictions, unlike other casinos that have their own token. We can't mine the token while playing with a bonus, which is a stupid rule in my opinion.

That's really a tough rule but there's no issue in such rule. If I'm not wrong then this rule also exist because Galactix team want to protect its token from the abusers. The ones who deposit money aren't the abusers and for good players it's not hard to wager $500 or even $1000. However, for small gamers it's still quite hard to complete $1000 wagering requirement, especially for the ones who deposit minimum amount to play at the casino.

We appreciate all the feedback and different perspectives on this! 😊

Here’s why we can’t implement it this way:

1. Mining would become too easy – If players started earning tokens from the very first wager, even without meeting the mining requirement, it would significantly increase the token supply early on. This would lead to inflation, which could reduce the long-term value of GLX and weaken the impact of dividends.

2. Abuse and farming risks – One of the main reasons for the $1,000 requirement is to prevent abuse. If tokens were earned from the first wager, some users could exploit the system by making small, low-risk bets just to farm GLX without actually engaging with the platform in a meaningful way. This would hurt legitimate players who are mining fairly.

3. Dividends would drop – A higher supply of GLX in circulation means that dividends would have to be split among more holders, which would reduce earnings for everyone. Our goal is to make dividends rewarding, and keeping mining exclusive to engaged players helps maintain strong returns.

4. Encouraging real engagement – The current system is designed to ensure that players actively participate before mining begins. This isn’t just about preventing abuse—it’s also about building a long-term, sustainable economy where GLX retains value and isn’t easily farmed without meaningful play.

We know the $1,000 requirement feels steep for smaller players, and we’re actively reviewing if there’s a way to make it more accessible without harming the balance of the system. But simply allowing mining from the first $1 wagered wouldn’t work without major risks to the token’s value and dividend structure.

Thanks again for the conversation—these discussions help us refine our approach, and we truly appreciate all the input!