Nonsense... mining is easy or difficult depending on one's balance. Bigger balance & bets = easier, and faster mining. Smaller balance & bets mean slow and difficult mining. So this rule of yours does not affect the difficulty of mining, you are denying players the opportunity to mine something with their first bets.
No offence, but you are probably a bit confused about all this when the terms are pretty simple to understand. That $1,000 requirement does increase the difficulty of mining because someone who hasn't reached that amount in wagers won't be able to mine tokens, and they are not denying players the opportunity to mine but they are rewarding more active and engaging players which is fair, imo.
What exactly would lead to inflation? People mining more tokens?
Exactly. Does that even need an explanation? Take this as an example: if anyone is allowed to mine tokens right from the beginning of their journey with Galactix, and if there are 20,000 players each wagering $10, 20,000 tokens will be mined. On the other hand, if only players who have wagered $1,000 or more are allowed to do so, and only maybe 6,000 among the 20,000 have reached that target, there will only be 6,000 tokens mined if they wager $10 each.
2. Abuse and farming risks – One of the main reasons for the $1,000 requirement is to prevent abuse. If tokens were earned from the first wager, some users could exploit the system by making small, low-risk bets just to farm GLX without actually engaging with the platform in a meaningful way. This would hurt legitimate players who are mining fairly.
Ok, that is your answer and I partly agree with it... but let's be honest here. What farming?
It would be nice if someone could explain to me what the benefit is of making small, low-risk bets just to farm GLX? And what does "fair mining" mean? All of us who register and deposit money mine fairly with every bet, and for every $10/$20 wagered we get one token. And is it fair of you that you don't give anything for wagering our first $1000?
You realize that a wager doesn't necessarily mean an amount that you've lost, right? It is an amount that you've bet, and a person can possibly reach a $1,000 wagering limit with only $50 or less, even if the odds for that would be low. I can reach a wagering requirement of $20 with only $5. So, don't you think a system where everyone is allowed to get tokens for wagering only $10 will be highly abused since completing wagering requirement, especially if they are low, is not that difficult?
The reason bonus funds don’t count toward GLX mining is because they aren’t real, risked funds.
They aren't real?
[/quote]
Do you consider a bonus as real money? You deposit $20, get $20 as a 100% deposit bonus, so you now have $40, but you only deposited $20. Where did the remaining $20 come from since you didn't deposit that much? A bonus is basically like a free pass for you to try and win something. That's why you get a wagering requirement with a bonus because it's not real, but if you put in efforts and your efforts work, they reward you for it by allowing you to withdraw it.