Quote from: whistle307194 on March 01, 2025, 12:04:17 PM

Quote from: vneos on March 01, 2025, 11:57:02 AM

Quote from: whistle307194 on March 01, 2025, 10:56:57 AM

Quote from: vneos on March 01, 2025, 10:37:46 AM

Quote from: whistle307194 on March 01, 2025, 09:40:18 AM

Exactly and You have readed my first post correctly so in order to get the private key I need that decimal hash160 string and a range boundary, optionally You can provide the initial address You have got in the first step.
Then I will provide results almost immediately.

Okay, let's do this.

decimal hash160 string:

Code:

1282931445580409769159733555426437642907293617404

range boundary:

Code:

80000000000000000:fffffffffffffffff

Pls give me the private key immediately. Roll Eyes

I need to clarify something once again - Yes, You have readed my first post correctly but You did not do the steps I ask for.
That would be simply too easy to give something I also want Wink

I have already provided the two parameters you need, and now you’re asking me for extra information.

Alright, you say that everything must be done exactly according to your steps, but the whole process is predicated on the fact that I need to know the private key.

Without the private key, I wouldn’t be able to get the string mentioned in step 6.

So, since I already know the private key, why do we have to engage in these tedious number transformation games?

Stop playing your number games—it's like saying that your birth year plus your age equals the current year.

That's why I wrote it is just a TEST to show You that there is another interesting approach available that looks like You are not familiar with.
Of course having a private key makes whole "decode" process useless but that is just only to show You that even though I don't know Your pvk but I have enough data of Your choice I am able to do what I say.

Your approach is very absurd. It's no different from saying, "Add the private key to the ripemd160 value and give me the new value." I can derive the result using subtraction. You're using division; that's the only difference.