In other words, which i personally think is actually more accurate, we can say that it's all about reputation, good reputation for the quality and not-so-good reputation for the quantity.
That is, if a casino wants to hire and work with only high ranking and reputable members on this forum, they definitely will have to spend more money because most high ranking and reputable member won't settle for peanuts as weekly payment.
While if the casino wants to pay far less, then it's very possible they will get a lot of applications still but they hardly will find any reputable member applying.
And on the norm, it's always better to mix this two, that is, hire reputable and not-so reputable members together because the reputable users in the campaign gives the company or casino some credibility and a good level of trust.
I believe that a signature campaign for example as one of marketing methods in the forum, but is the most favorite one after advertisement banner ban from theymos will have different criteria from company and manager to choose participants and assess their campaign effects to their business.
I agree somewhat but disagree somewhat. Reputation can give impression at first glance with high green trust numbers, but it does not mean too much with forum members that are looking for good posts to read and learn. There are forum members who are new members, or old members but don't have high green trust numbers, but their posts are excellent.
A campaign can have a mixture of high trusted members and good quality posters.