You seem to be the arrogant one, LGD2Business.
This thread is not even about trading.
Specifically we are here talking about various BTC accumulation strategies, and sure maybe you are distracted by the title of "buying the dip," but still we have an investment focus in this thread.
Another thing.. sure you may well be correct that it is safer to trade bitcoin than shitcoins, yet it is hardly even a great topic, even if it were relevant to this thread - especially since whatever trading approaches that anyone chooses to employ has a lot of potential variability, to the extent that trading is not devolving into variations of degenerate gambling in the first place.
Looking at your forum registration date, yeah you have been registered on the forum for 10 years, so yeah, it is nice to interact with members who have experience, yet you still might be grappling with how investing into bitcoin differs from trading it, to the extent that you might want to try to stay topical in terms of this particular thread.. and yeah, there is nothing wrong with having differing ideas, yet it is going to be quite irritating if you are going to want to talk about trading, when the ways that you have been talking about bitcoin so far seems to be deviating from the focus of this thread.
If you have followed the topic and looked at the message where the main discussion started, you must have noticed that a few people are deliberately rephrasing words differently to steer the issue into an off-topic debate. New users trying to manipulate the topic in this way should not be allowed.
When you look at the entire message, you can see that when I mentioned trading Bitcoin, I was referring to buying from the dip. I wasn't talking about trading in the sense of constantly buying and selling. Therefore, in the context of the topic my message was a normal on-topic discussion. However, since these people are spammers who don't even understand what they read, they cut half of a sentence and started attacking based on that.
They are cutting only one sentence from my message and distorting it from its original meaning to manipulate the situation. I wonder what the real purpose is of those who create an uproar as if you said something you never actually said and then attack based on that. I guess they have no other concern than creating fake debates to fill their message quotas. If they earn a few merits in the process, it becomes even more profitable for them. I don't even think they have invested in Bitcoin at all.