On the lines of your egotistic attitude that I have already alluded to.

You (just as every other member) have a right to ask as many questions as you would like because if questions and debate are cast aside there is not much left in the forum.

Many others share your disappointment with the forum as far as the lack of migration to new software is concerned but probably for other reasons too for example distribution of merits and account rank system to name a few. On this, I can understand any frustration that manifests because members that care about the forum do not like the direction of certain aspects but the manner in which that frustration is channelled is extremely important.

If you are concerned with malpractice and corruption, you should articulate your case in a manner that does not alienate others and is designed to generate a welcomed debate. If you do not trust BC.Game that is your prerogative and of course you have a right to your opinion. Now, if I disagree with your opinion you might suggest I am participating in their signature campaign therefore am biased. I could apply the same logic and state you have an agenda against BC.Game because you are being paid by a competitor casino to participate in their signature campaign. The cycle continues.

It does not change the fact BC.Game have some resolved and some unresolved scam accusations but many casino/gaming websites are the same therefore we can come to our own judgment about them (just you did). Nor does it change the fact BC.Game paid out $7 million to a single winner therefore those that like/support/trust it whether participating in a signature campaign nor not, also have a right to their views.

It seems in the OP you alluded to the view of certain members running giveaways and adding BC.Game to their trust inclusions are effectively corrupt therefore are biased and will defend BC.Game. You then struck it out and that is a positive move. As for your personal grudge against icopress (most if us that recall the incident) are aware it coincided with you making multiple attempts to join his campaigns and refusal to hire you. On that basis it seems (as I am giving the benefit of the doubt) your dislike and distrust of BC.Game is more about your sentiments towards icopress.

I will not seek details of how/why you have concluded I am a manipulative person, instead it is reassuring to know my words did not (and will not) bother you. Having said that, I will try to refrain from using certain words and I will try to engage with you.

Regarding your distrust of BC.Game, it has been noted therefore what remains to be discussed here?

Lol. Big surprise:

So how's that power play working out for you OP:

I'm not upset, it's just funny he did exactly what I expected. Excluding him in retaliation would be bad, and I see no reason to do so.

Lol.

LoyceV, I trusted you despite believing your tools should be open source so that they can be self-hosted instead of reliant on your server (and wondering for what reason they aren't), and despite this, still had you as someone I would trust...and while it means nothing in this broken trust system, you are off my trust list. Nutildah, you've always been questionable and I never knew if I trusted your general existence or not, and even though you were quick to put ~BenCodie on your list...now, I officially do not trust you...because you're right, our values are different, and on a personal level I don't believe yours are morally a high enough standard to be trusted.