Quote from: Free Market Capitalist on Today at 06:39:08 AM

Quote from: JollyGood on August 15, 2025, 07:44:13 PM

I am not surprised to find another scam accusation thread related to BC Game. This trend has been going on for quite some time.

If BC Game conclude this is not a worrying time for them, they will continue doing what they do. If they care about their reputation (what is left of it), at some stage they should ask themselves what they need to change in order to minimise the number of scam accusations being made against them.

I am aware There have been other accusations against this site, but as we usually see, many of them come to nothing. Do you give this one much credibility? The only image he has posted is a screenshot of an email by BC explaining him how to recover an account. I don't see any proof of anything in this thread.

I'm not saying the OP is wrong either. I hope that in the end his problem can be resolved, perhaps with holydarkness' help, as we've seen other times in this section of the forum as well.

Oh well, this is an interesting approach from JollyGood.
Not so long ago, he was a participant in the Bc.game signature campaign, which was handled by another campaign manager (I don't want to bother him by mentioning his name; he has nothing to do here). That is not a problem. But I am sure you saw a thread on the reputation board created by Bencodie at the beginning of this year. JollyGood literally attacked BenCodie and defended the Bc game. I don't want to quote the personal fight part, but only the relevant part -

Quote from: JollyGood on February 28, 2025, 03:22:42 PM

If you are concerned with malpractice and corruption, you should articulate your case in a manner that does not alienate others and is designed to generate a welcomed debate. If you do not trust BC.Game that is your prerogative and of course you have a right to your opinion. Now, if I disagree with your opinion you might suggest I am participating in their signature campaign therefore am biased. I could apply the same logic and state you have an agenda against BC.Game because you are being paid by a competitor casino to participate in their signature campaign. The cycle continues.

It does not change the fact BC.Game have some resolved and some unresolved scam accusations but many casino/gaming websites are the same therefore we can come to our own judgment about them (just you did). Nor does it change the fact BC.Game paid out $7 million to a single winner therefore those that like/support/trust it whether participating in a signature campaign nor not, also have a right to their views.

It seems in the OP you alluded to the view of certain members running giveaways and adding BC.Game to their trust inclusions are effectively corrupt therefore are biased and will defend BC.Game. You then struck it out and that is a positive move. As for your personal grudge against (manager name) (most if us that recall the incident) are aware it coincided with you making multiple attempts to join his campaigns and refusal to hire you. On that basis it seems (as I am giving the benefit of the doubt) your dislike and distrust of BC.Game is more about your sentiments towards (manager name)

There are a few more posts from JollyGood from that thread. But those are irrelevant here. They were fighting each other. But JollyGood was giving every ounce of his energy to defend the Bc game and the manager. As you may know, the Bc game was discontinued with the first manager and is now running their signature campaign with another manager. So, JollyGood was removed from the BC game campaign, and now he is free as a bird. He can now post against the Bc game. Now I want to ask the same question he asked BenCodie

"Does this not embarrass you JollyGood?"

Quote from: JollyGood on March 04, 2025, 12:02:48 AM

These are the campaigns I found that were/are managed by (removed manager name) and you asked to join. You cite Betnomi as a scam yet you yourself asked to be enrolled with the words "Hi. Can I please enter this campaign?". Does this not embarrass you?

FYI - I think I am one of the guys who didn't miss a single chance to criticize the BC game in every other scam accusation thread. holydarkness is aware of my criticism. There is no way I am defending the BC game. But I found it interesting that "JollyGood is a character which nobody can replicate".