Quote from: AB de Royse777 on March 04, 2025, 07:50:06 PM

Quote from: JollyGood on February 28, 2025, 06:21:18 PM

I would like to ask a simple but nevertheless very important question. Merit source or otherwise, based on facts alone do you agree to the following statement:

"I believe AB de Royse (given his activities like past promoting BitLucy, part ownership in the BitLucy scam and his involvement in [banned mixer]) after JollyGood created a thread After Chipmixer, Is Sinbad.io Next To Be Shutdown? pointing to the criminal activity the mixer was engaged in but AB de Royse continued to be employed by them and be on their payroll to promote it and that was the final catalyst that resulted in theymos banning mixers, he is less than likely to be a 100% honest and legitimate business person and I still believe that he should not be a merit source".

Do you concur?

Quote from: BenCodie on February 27, 2025, 11:30:38 PM

I believe icoproess (given his activities like promoting bc.game, past scams like betnomi and his involvement in [banned mixer], the mixer white-label platforms) he is less than likely to be a 100% honest and legitimate business person and I still believe that he should not be a merit source.

JollyGood, you do not take rest right? You continue impressing your manager like those of the fake users worldofcoins and the other fake user theboss of something. Are you also a user who is "the dream of a manager"?

For the record I requested theymos to remove me from merit source and banning me from DT1 voting. If you are considering me any of it then you are wrong.

This is what I found which is not fair - Being a former merit source and DT1 powered member I can tell that when you have any of these privileges or both of the tools then you can easily misuse it to benefit your campaign management business. You can easily manipulate users of your choice in your DT1 list (make yourself a fake one of the most trusted member, increase your positive feedback rating and many other things related to trust and feedback), you can easily send sMerits to targeted members to receive favor from them eventually you can do many other things to benefit your own campaign business.

What I suggest is those of us who are campaign manager and established us doing business in the forum: All of us should be banned from (1) DT1 voting (2) Merit source, even not to have the 1 sMerit from the received 2 Merits. We (The managers) should not have sMerits and DT1 voting privilege.

I completely agree with this, campaign managers should not have DT1 or merit source powers. The community should have established this rule a long time ago as while you have seen this as a problem and made a change yourself, I don't think the same rationale would be applied by other campaign managers.