Quote from: PaperWallet on March 05, 2025, 08:30:22 AM

I have a judgment against Fortunejack for unpaid winnings exceeding 100,000 dollars. During the legal process they’ve changed company name and moved out of Curacao.

I have not seen any updates from you for a long time though do have recollections about your scam accusation. Well, you certainly followed through with your aims to fight them in Court and it has taken years but you managed to win. To take on a massive company with money to buy the best lawyers would have taken a toll on anybody. Did you fight your own case or pay a lawyer?

In this thread you mentioned you were awarded 85% of the amount plus interest and fees therefore that might bring the final amount close to the $120,000 you were claiming. How do you feel after fighting for this length of time and winning?

If they are entitled to appeal there is a chance they could overturn the original court order. There is a possibility maybe some evidence was misunderstood in the first case or they can prove they did not do anything wrong in the appeal and have the case dismissed. Have FortuneJack filed an appeal?

Quote from: holydarkness on March 05, 2025, 06:31:36 PM

About Curacao licensing, many casinos "jump ship" from Curacao upon the old four-master-license holder being obsolete and they transitioned to CGA. So, Antillephone is no longer have power over FJ.

I think there have been cases where crypto casinos have moved from one licence issuer to another (or basically from one jurisdiction to another) because judgments have been made against them. If there was a uniformed/collective policy by licence issuers against this behaviour, I think it would be difficult for this process to take place unless of course there were exceptional circumstances. having said that, there are many reasons why a casino/gaming website could move.

For example, BC.Game recently moved out of Curaçao with this statement after a case was brought against them statement: "Despite ongoing efforts to modernize Curaçao’s iGaming law, proper legal protection for all operators established in Curaçao is severely lacking, such as its bankruptcy law which dates to 1931 via the “Curaçao Bankruptcy Decree”, which can easily be exploited by malicious actors and used against legitimate operators.". They claim a 1931 law is being used maliciously by actors against legitimate casinos.

Another is Stake. It was involved in problems with UK regulators and have had their licence to operate inside the country revoked but Stake is still registered with Curaçao. Even Premier League and other sports teams have have been advised if they continue to wear the Stake sponsorship logo and they could be fined as they will breaking the law for promoting an unlicenced casino/gaming website.