Quote from: khaled0111 on Today at 10:56:49 PM

Quote from: Taskford on Today at 10:38:57 PM

They would never get decent discussion if they don't do any changes since people would just continue to discuss those past situations happened here and for sure that there's nothing to gain if they tied up with negative reputation gain by their old manager. I don't know if the Betkin official representative could read what's happening here, but if they are aware of current troubles happening maybe best for them to bring some changes because they would never became successful in their current situation.

In my humble opinion and as I mentioned in my previous reply, BetKin bears no responsibility for what happened. They sent the funds to cover the campaign payments, so they obviously fully honored their part of the deal.

Yes, it's base on mutual trust, if we can recall, there was one campaign years ago wherein the project sends the fund to the campaign manager and then the wallet gets hack. But they can't do anything about it and still continue with that campaign manager.

Quote from: khaled0111 on Today at 10:56:49 PM

Can anyone confirm (or does anyone know) if OP is indeed part of the team, if he was appointed by the casino owners to represent them here, or if this account is controlled by the campaign manager? His last login was two days ago, so they certainly know what’s going on, and it would be great if they address it.

It's very hard to confirm though, I mean just think about it, there are a lot of great campaign managers here, those who have handle a lot and has been trusted. And only Betkin can answer that if they are willing on why and how they choses their campaign manager and now it's a brand disaster for them.