Quote from: holydarkness on March 08, 2025, 05:51:03 PM

I've withdrawn myself from your case [well, your second case] right after I tried to assist you on your first one and you said, on that second case, that I twist your words on your prior case, remember? The previous case were the one where you omitted key facts of another bets that become the root and ultimately the resolution of the problem from your narrative?

I can see now that it's your MO, making false statement, one is shown above, that you admitted yourself. Kinda make me wonder how many more false statements you've deliberately made to steer the narrative? And how should people take your words and any statement at face value?

@HolyDarkness – Ah, so now you care about false narratives—just not when they’re about Stake’s fraudulent activities, deleted bet archives, rigged RTP, and GDPR violations. Convenient timing, wouldn’t you say?

You say you’re just “clarifying” things, but your selective involvement makes it clear—you only “jump in” when you need to defend yourself or redirect attention away from Stake.

🔹 Where was your so-called "clarification" when Stake refused to provide full betting history under GDPR?
🔹 Where was your voice when StakeExposed.com was wiped from existence?
🔹 Where was your transparency when Stake’s RTP was proven to be manipulated beyond statistical probability?

A real spectator doesn’t engage, doesn’t intervene, and definitely doesn’t shift the conversation whenever Stake gets called out. Yet you do it every single time.

You’re not clarifying, you’re deflecting. And no amount of backpedaling can erase the fact that you’ve actively played a role in protecting Stake’s image.

Quote from: Zwei on March 08, 2025, 06:23:25 PM

I am too dumb!!

@Zwei – Another Stake defense squad member reporting for duty. The moment things heat up, you show up with zero evidence, zero logic, and 100% troll energy.

🔹 You mock victims but don’t question why Stake deletes user bet data.
🔹 You laugh at statistical proof but can’t explain why RTP is provably manipulated.
🔹 You throw weak insults but have nothing to say about Stake erasing an entire website that exposed them.

So tell us, genius—if my evidence is “false,” why is Stake hiding user data instead of disproving it? Why are they deleting historical records instead of proving their fairness?

54.62% RTP instead of 99.5% = Fraud.
Missing bet archives = Cover-up.
Deleting StakeExposed.com = Censorship.

These are facts, not theories. And you can keep spamming troll images all day, but facts don’t disappear just because you refuse to acknowledge them.

Try again, but this time, bring real arguments instead of clown emojis.