~
Again, nobody know the future. But Z did it to himself in the White House visit. [...]
What happened at the WH is largely irrelevant. There is an underlying problem that is Trump not planning for a security guarantee for Ukraine and trying to force Ukraine to sign a shitty deal.
Ukraine could have signed that type of deal at anytime during the last three years, but it is obvious (and I have posted recently a detailed analysis) that it does not solve the problem of Putin invading again in a couple of years if not earlier. That type of arrangement is firstly the death sentence for Ukraine and anyway unacceptable for the Ukrainian pairlament and leaders.
If you can stop for a minute the stormshow of crap and false narratives, you may eventually see what this war is about.
Why should Trump plan a security agreement for Ukraine? Z doesn't want peace. He would simply be the Putin you talk about. How do we know? He started the war by moving troops to the border, and by fighting his own people in Donetsk and the Donbas for nothing.
With the kind of leader Z is, looks like Putin is going to have to shut Ukraine down just to get peace.
You know what this war is about, just like anyone who looks. It's about the Western bankers trying to steal Russia and Siberia from the Russians, something they have been trying to do for over 100 years.
What the US needs to do is make a solid statement by removing the sanctions against Russia. Europe is failing as it is. If the US did that, Europe would simply wither on the vine.
You jokers should really forget Ukraine and concentrate on making trade deals with Russia.
Ukraine want a lasting peace. Peace can be reached at any moment, you just have to rennounce to having your own contry, let all the people be ruled from Moscow or wait for the next invasion.
This is perfectly rational, no joke. Ruzzia invaded Crimea and then started a permanent conflict in the Donbas - as they know that countries with conflicts cannot join NATO.
Zelensky wants the right peace, just as Ruzzia only speaks of peace always in terms that they know are not acceptable to Ukraine. Again, this is rational from the Kremlin, as their goal is to take all Ukraine and then pressure the democracies of the old Warsaw Pact until they rebuild their empire.
I am not making any of this up. It has happened: Ruzzia invaded and annexed Crimean, kept sending troops and funds to create a conflic in Dombas, it has happened again in the elections in Romania and a number of ciber=attacks in Europe, not to mention the financing of extreme right anti-EU groups.
The only thing that has changed is that the US, despite being a guarantor of the integrity of Ukraine with the Budapest memorandum. having promised to defend Ukraine and its sovereignty has decided that they will simply not do so. They also wish to weaken NATO as much as possible.
I think that the US has forgotten than last time that all the Soviet Republics were under Moscow's thumb, they spend 5 decades trying to topple it and having to spend billions (for real, not by Trump's "accounting") in keeping the US safe.
I hope you get paid in US, the Yuan is not doing that well. Nor the SP500, nor the NASDAQ... nor bitcoin.
Another silly attempt to rewrite history and confuse cause and effect. But everyone who can read, knows that Ukraine was under Russia's sphere of influence up to 2013, everyone lived fined and neither EU or US didn't care about it much. And it's the attempt to take Ukraine with cookies into NATO that is the root cause of this all. Now US figured that it's just not worth it to continue and is now backing off. We all saw how well Ukraine performed with US aid, now think what will happen without it, we can already start to see it, in Kursk. The only question left now is how many more people Z is willing to sacrifice, before admitting the inevitable putting on a suit and starting to negotiate.