Quote from: Stable090 on March 10, 2025, 09:06:43 PM

Quote from: Obim34 on March 10, 2025, 07:57:32 PM

Manchester United were a bit lucky, the whole game was possessed by Arsenal, if Arsenal attack was as strong as Liverpool then the number of goals in that match would be more numbered than yesterday score line.

How are Manchester United lucky? If Manchester United are having a better attacker, they will have scored more than a goal which they scored, Manchester United played a defensive game, but they created some nice chances also, if Manchester United are having a good finisher, then they wilm have scored multiple goals, because they will be able to convert some chances.

I wont really say one team was lucky in the match, they both played well, and if they both had a better attacker in the match, then they both will have scored multiple goals in the match. Don’t think it’s only Arsenal that’s having that problem currently.

It wasn't about Manchester United not having a good attacker. It was David Raya that was outstanding with his performance in that match. He made some good saves that it appeared that Manchester United didn't have good offensive players. If not for David Raya's performance there is no doubt that Manchester United would have scored more goals. So let's give credit to Raya for his performance, instead of labelling it that Manchester United don't have good attacking players.

Defensively Manchester United were also solid, I didn't expect them to be that good in defence, given how fragile their defence has been this season, but somehow they managed to pull that off. If we are to consider a side that was short of a sticking option between Arsenal and Manchester United, I will say it was Arsenal because they didn't have any recognised center forward in their team against Manchester United. Manchester United had two recognised strikers, so I'm really surprised why someone will say they don't have a striker.