I would like to see the bets and since it is now available it means I can verify it myself and can find my losing streak of 158 bets happened at 15.5% wining chances-
As they were saying earlier there is no data on earth which can show the bet result-Bet amount-Bet Chances-Bet Sides, I am wondering how it comes possible now and was not possible during last 3 months.
Now Let’s see why I doubted you that you are not neutral at all
Your Statements earlier
I would like to address the matter from my POV, if I may,
Imagine a piece of paper, or a book, if you may, titled "horsbyname". In it, DuckDice wrote all of your information. Your name, DoB, address, other KYC related things, your deposit and withdrawal history, your betting log, your bonuses, your chat, your complaints, your email, every single thing tha happened to a "horsbyname" during his stay in DuckDice.
At the end of that book, there is an entry, a line: "burn this book".
So, the book burned.
All of the content of the book, all of those betting records[/color and personal info, all of those chats and emails, including the very one that wrote "burn this book" are thrown into fire and extinguished.
That is the "right to be forgotten" of GDPR.
There were not a single entry of "horsbyname" in DuckDice following that request of removal. Not one. Nothing. Nada.
2. I hope you are still standing
Here you turned on all of your GDPR Statements for sake of Duckdice.io and ruined your 9 year reputations at all. It is not violation of GDPR anymore since it stand in fev of Duckdice?
With about thousands of entries that made my eyes water just to scan them, not only that the statement of playing in 15.5% chance is unfounded as the bets were made with 33% chance, the more important point that I think is better to be pointed out rather than the 33% v. 15.5% is that I can not find a losing streak of 158 times. Not even a 50 losing streak in a row.
With this, I believe I can safely say that the claim of 158 losing streak at 15.5% is unproven to be true.
May I know if you have now the bets showing the result of my bets? The way you confirm it that my bets were placed 33% wining chances not 15.5%
they maybe have provided you with a very limited number of bets which were placed on 33% at the beginning of my session, Now there is data showing full result which will help me to verify that my loses were fair and it will bring peace to mind.
Your Statement is more like making me look like the scammer, You have not explained that Kirito89 Posted Imgur: The magic of the Internet this email and accused me that this email was received for 0.01 btc and it was me who sent it from a email similar to mine ( Kerosinkiroz@gmail.com) but different with one later.
Here is hi accusation:
For full transparency, the email connection I've had linking OP was due to the trustpilot review he has posted, the one he confirmed in this thread as being his aswell, where we can request further information and are able to see more info provided by OP, including email address he used to provide that review. In the meantime ( and likely due to my big mouth as I've stated I can link him due to the emails) his trustpilot review dissapeared, making the information unavailable.[/colo] I've currently contactd trustpilot in the hopes they restore the provided information. But in the meantime OP, can you provide a confirmation email from trustpilot that they have removed the review? ( they send an email notification if one of your reviews gets taken down) And that it wasn't you who deleted it
[/size] ?
Kirito89, Duckdice Support.[/quote]
[/quote]
Of Fairness and Transparency as The Aim of The Thread
The player sent DuckDice an email asking for a refund if transparency can not be provided, despite the claim that the purpose of the threads are to get clarification of the losing streak. I can see that the emails are indeed sent from the players email address as shown on the other thread.
By the way you didn’t took into account, that you was suppose to get the evidances of accusations as well-Upon which we were agreed.
Anyway lets come to the proofs point.
Kirirto89 you have to show your evidences of me Sending blackmailing emails for 0.01btc
2. Trustpilot link- that my review was posted from the same email you was blackmailed from for 0.01 btc.
3. That I didn’t played on 15.5% chances but 33% chances.
4. You have provide evidences that the blackmailing email you have received is from the same email similar to mine but different with one later.
We are at the point where Kirito89 gotta back his accusations. I’ve accepted your deal, gave consent already Now the ball’s in his court.
Did he provide you the Email that I sent demanding 0.01 btc? was the email similar to mine? Also how about trustpilot reviews link was it posted from my email? and You can see the bets is played on 33% chances right?
As they were saying earlier there is no data on earth which can show the bet result-Bet amount-Bet Chances-Bet Sides, I am wondering how it comes possible now and was not possible during last 3 months.
Now Let’s see why I doubted you that you are not neutral at all
Your Statements earlier
I would like to address the matter from my POV, if I may,
Imagine a piece of paper, or a book, if you may, titled "horsbyname". In it, DuckDice wrote all of your information. Your name, DoB, address, other KYC related things, your deposit and withdrawal history, your betting log, your bonuses, your chat, your complaints, your email, every single thing tha happened to a "horsbyname" during his stay in DuckDice.
At the end of that book, there is an entry, a line: "burn this book".
So, the book burned.
All of the content of the book, all of those betting records[/color and personal info, all of those chats and emails, including the very one that wrote "burn this book" are thrown into fire and extinguished.
That is the "right to be forgotten" of GDPR.
There were not a single entry of "horsbyname" in DuckDice following that request of removal. Not one. Nothing. Nada.
2. I hope you are still standing
All of the content of the book, all of those betting records and personal info, all of those chats and emails, including the very one that wrote "burn this book" are thrown into fire and extinguished.
If they can provide it, it means the data was not erased and their statement that your data is no longer exist is false, thus, a lie, and logically they will not say this as it'll be a reputation-suicide. Thus, even if they have it as you never asked for removal, they will not provide it.
The other way to disprove that, is for you to provide that proof, which another paradox by itself.
Paradoxical. Illogical. Moot.
Drop it.
A way out of this endless loop is to think a logic out of those illogical things.
They want to disprove your statement that you're on 158 losing streak. It'll be a piece of cake if they have your betting history. What benefit do they get from saying that your data has been wiped clean? When the key of their rebuttal is in that data itself?
The fact that they can't make a rebuttal of you having 158 losing streak because they can't look at it on your betting history in their database, would indicate that the history itself is, indeed, no longer exist.
Why is it no longer exist? Because it's removed.
Why is it removed? Because of the right to be forgotten.
Where's the proof of it? Nothing. Not from their side. It's being forgotten. Burned.
It's a really simple situation that I am sure everybody reading this case can easily understand. I hope you can understand the situation that applied now too.
If they can provide it, it means the data was not erased and their statement that your data is no longer exist is false, thus, a lie, and logically they will not say this as it'll be a reputation-suicide. Thus, even if they have it as you never asked for removal, they will not provide it.
The other way to disprove that, is for you to provide that proof, which another paradox by itself.
Paradoxical. Illogical. Moot.
Drop it.
A way out of this endless loop is to think a logic out of those illogical things.
They want to disprove your statement that you're on 158 losing streak. It'll be a piece of cake if they have your betting history. What benefit do they get from saying that your data has been wiped clean? When the key of their rebuttal is in that data itself?
The fact that they can't make a rebuttal of you having 158 losing streak because they can't look at it on your betting history in their database, would indicate that the history itself is, indeed, no longer exist.
Why is it no longer exist? Because it's removed.
Why is it removed? Because of the right to be forgotten.
Where's the proof of it? Nothing. Not from their side. It's being forgotten. Burned.
It's a really simple situation that I am sure everybody reading this case can easily understand. I hope you can understand the situation that applied now too.
Here you turned on all of your GDPR Statements for sake of Duckdice.io and ruined your 9 year reputations at all. It is not violation of GDPR anymore since it stand in fev of Duckdice?
With about thousands of entries that made my eyes water just to scan them, not only that the statement of playing in 15.5% chance is unfounded as the bets were made with 33% chance, the more important point that I think is better to be pointed out rather than the 33% v. 15.5% is that I can not find a losing streak of 158 times. Not even a 50 losing streak in a row.
With this, I believe I can safely say that the claim of 158 losing streak at 15.5% is unproven to be true.
May I know if you have now the bets showing the result of my bets? The way you confirm it that my bets were placed 33% wining chances not 15.5%
they maybe have provided you with a very limited number of bets which were placed on 33% at the beginning of my session, Now there is data showing full result which will help me to verify that my loses were fair and it will bring peace to mind.
Your Statement is more like making me look like the scammer, You have not explained that Kirito89 Posted Imgur: The magic of the Internet this email and accused me that this email was received for 0.01 btc and it was me who sent it from a email similar to mine ( Kerosinkiroz@gmail.com) but different with one later.
Here is hi accusation:
4. OP didn't take into account, that the blackmailer's email, and his email are unique, only separated by 1 letter, so if someone was trying to take advantage of his bitcointalk thread, there would be no way of guessing his unique email, I've actually asked him in the other thread if he gives me permission (due to GDPR constraints) to disclose his email, which he conviniently ignored, so regardless of any reason provided by you, or me, or anyone else for that matter, he will simply ignore it and spam the thread so he can push his narrative.
Again I'd like to thank you for objective support on this matter!
Kirito89,
Duckdice Support.
Again I'd like to thank you for objective support on this matter!
Kirito89,
Duckdice Support.
Do I have permission to publicly show the email address you've been in contact with us? that way I can show the blackmailer's email address, and let bitcointalk give their oppinion on it .
Kirito89,
Duckdice Support.
.Kirito89,
Duckdice Support.
For full transparency, the email connection I've had linking OP was due to the trustpilot review he has posted, the one he confirmed in this thread as being his aswell, where we can request further information and are able to see more info provided by OP, including email address he used to provide that review. In the meantime ( and likely due to my big mouth as I've stated I can link him due to the emails) his trustpilot review dissapeared, making the information unavailable.[/colo] I've currently contactd trustpilot in the hopes they restore the provided information. But in the meantime OP, can you provide a confirmation email from trustpilot that they have removed the review? ( they send an email notification if one of your reviews gets taken down) And that it wasn't you who deleted it
[/size] ?Kirito89, Duckdice Support.[/quote]
[/quote]
Of Fairness and Transparency as The Aim of The Thread
The player sent DuckDice an email asking for a refund if transparency can not be provided, despite the claim that the purpose of the threads are to get clarification of the losing streak. I can see that the emails are indeed sent from the players email address as shown on the other thread.
By the way you didn’t took into account, that you was suppose to get the evidances of accusations as well-Upon which we were agreed.
Anyway lets come to the proofs point.
Kirirto89 you have to show your evidences of me Sending blackmailing emails for 0.01btc
2. Trustpilot link- that my review was posted from the same email you was blackmailed from for 0.01 btc.
3. That I didn’t played on 15.5% chances but 33% chances.
4. You have provide evidences that the blackmailing email you have received is from the same email similar to mine but different with one later.
We are at the point where Kirito89 gotta back his accusations. I’ve accepted your deal, gave consent already Now the ball’s in his court.
Did he provide you the Email that I sent demanding 0.01 btc? was the email similar to mine? Also how about trustpilot reviews link was it posted from my email? and You can see the bets is played on 33% chances right?