Bet 3 was live and considered invalid by the court?
No, that's not what the judgment says, that's not what anybody here has said, nor is it what your translated text says...
"Void without right" means "valid".
You got it right the first time.
That's what I thought until OP posted this in his last quote
paying bet 1 and stealing your winnings from bets 2, 3 and 4”.
I don't think that the OP understands the judgement.