No Evidences
Well, your novel contains many line defending duckdice.io openly now.
I will cut it Short, You have ignored many questions upon which we were agreed, and I repost it because you forget things.
We agreed by
Kirirto89 you have to show your evidences of me Sending blackmailing emails for 0.01btc
2. Trustpilot link- that my review was posted from the same email you was blackmailed from for 0.01 btc.
3. That I didn’t played on 15.5% chances but 33% chances.
4. You have to provide evidences that the blackmailing email you have received is from the same email similar to mine but different with one later.[/b]
We are at the point where Kirito89 gotta back his accusations. I’ve accepted your deal, gave consent already Now the ball’s in his court.
You covered none of them but wrote a novel about things which is already posted in the thread you got nothing from duckdice.io at all-what you have is already in the thread posted by me. You wasn’t supposed to be the Private eye for the things reviled already in public.
What do you mean by
DuckDice or Kirito89 as the representative of DuckDice, who entered that written agreement with you, are allowed to raise a type-3 flag against you, for a breach of written contract.
Having said that its mean I can create 10 flags against kirito89 right? No?
Kirito89, I've got a written consent through PM from OP to validate the situation of similar email account. It came with several terms, but after mulling over it the entire day, I think the best approach is to actually leave both parties in the blind, so, simplified, kindly provide me [through PM, not here publicly] the evidence of those email similarities, and I'll take it from there, if you don't mind.
Thank you for the assist holydarkness, I'm curently on vacation for 2 days. So once I return I will come to your dms with the email evidence
.Kirito89,
Duckdice Support.
[/quote]
And when he says NO to that sharing, you didn’t ask me to create flag against him-Instead you post the story of red steel bars
Why double standard 9 years old reputable bridge? You were supposed to be the bridge to see if the accusation of Kirito89 is true or false but you completely drop it and sticked to a bunch of numbers showing no result but tied to me because I provided the proof showing 33% chances.
Yes, I still stand by Statement but since they didn’t provide any proof of my losing were fair and was manipulated I want them to pay my loses back.
What do you think why I come to bitcointalk and create the thread? To get accused from someone’s who have history of accusing users who raise voice against them, who have history of manipulating bets results?
at all you didn’t obey your duty of being a bridge. I still stand my words only if you stand by yours, ask kirito89 to provide evidences of his accusations
1. show evidences of me Sending blackmailing emails for 0.01btc
2. Trustpilot link- that my review was posted from the same email you were blackmailed from for 0.01 btc.
3. That I didn’t played on 15.5% chances but 33% chances.
4. Provide evidences that the blackmailing email you have received is from the same email similar to mine but different with one later.
This is what we were agreed on