I would like to see the bets and since it is now available it means I can verify it myself and can find my losing streak of 158 bets happened at 15.5% wining chances-
Unfortunately, that is not under my purview to whom can the log being shown. I am not the author and has no ownership of it, simply there to look at its content and verify.
But it should not be your concern anymore, is it?
You both give your consent in a writing statement; you allow me to verify the proof that shall be provided by DuckDice, that you'll trust that I'll stand on neutral ground and reported to the public what I see 100% based on what I see? And in response to this, as well as their part of consenting into the agreement, they provide the evidence.
And when the result came, you violated your part of agreement with, "Now Let’s see why I doubted you that you are not neutral at all"?
Still standing from neutral ground when I say that it's kinda ironic that you can end up with DuckDice actually raising a type-3 flag against you for violating a written agreement. And since I am still standing from the neutral ground, in the spirit of transparency, I "exported" the data to AI, since reading the line one by one proven to take a lot of time and put strain on my eyes so much, and I am not that good in writing spreadsheet formula that can easily pull the data off, this is the tally of the winning/losing streak according to the data being processed by AI:
Code:
Here are the five longest streaks of consecutive 1s and 0s in your data:
1s → 8 times
1s → 7 times
1s → 7 times
1s → 6 times
1s → 6 times
0s → 18 times
0s → 17 times
0s → 17 times
0s → 17 times
0s → 16 times
1s → 8 times
1s → 7 times
1s → 7 times
1s → 6 times
1s → 6 times
0s → 18 times
0s → 17 times
0s → 17 times
0s → 17 times
0s → 16 times
As they were saying earlier there is no data on earth which can show the bet result-Bet amount-Bet Chances-Bet Sides, I am wondering how it comes possible now and was not possible during last 3 months.
Now Let’s see why I doubted you that you are not neutral at all
Your Statements earlier
[...]
Here you turned on all of your GDPR Statements for sake of Duckdice.io and ruined your 9 year reputations at all. It is not violation of GDPR anymore since it stand in fev of Duckdice?
Now Let’s see why I doubted you that you are not neutral at all
Your Statements earlier
[...]
Here you turned on all of your GDPR Statements for sake of Duckdice.io and ruined your 9 year reputations at all. It is not violation of GDPR anymore since it stand in fev of Duckdice?
It's been addressed in my full explanation above, as well as Kirito89's that precedes mine. Kindly refer to it. But if I have to explain ELI5, the data was being pulled from the server seed, not the player's private data. This is the propietary of DuckDice, and not the players. The data does not being wiped when someone enact Right to be Forgotten as it is not the player's property. However, that data still got affected by the Right to be Forgotten as they became just a bunch of numbers that can not be associated to the former player.
They're simply numbers and sequences sitting in DuckDice hard disk [or do you guys use SSD?] with no ownership, just data for internal record.
It was until you gave your betID, which reveal your client seed and server seed that the ties that once severed can be re-established and those data can be pulled from the corner of their storage... wait, that's not precisely correct, it took several weeks before DuckDice realized that the betID you gave did not just serving as a way to emulate the bets like what Khaled compiled, but also help retracing the ownership of those nameless data on their server, through the server seed revealed upon checking that betID, that upon being pulled, "restored" your betting history.
If you still need details of it, I think Kirito89 will explain all of the technicalities to you, if you ask nicely.
With about thousands of entries that made my eyes water just to scan them, not only that the statement of playing in 15.5% chance is unfounded as the bets were made with 33% chance, the more important point that I think is better to be pointed out rather than the 33% v. 15.5% is that I can not find a losing streak of 158 times. Not even a 50 losing streak in a row.
With this, I believe I can safely say that the claim of 158 losing streak at 15.5% is unproven to be true.
May I know if you have now the bets showing the result of my bets? The way you confirm it that my bets were placed 33% wining chances not 15.5%
they maybe have provided you with a very limited number of bets which were placed on 33% at the beginning of my session, Now there is data showing full result which will help me to verify that my loses were fair and it will bring peace to mind.
Uhh... how many times did you bet, if you don't mind me asking? Since I think that "thousands of entries" kinda give a good picture whether what they gave me is limited and selected few numbers of your bets or not.
Your Statement is more like making me look like the scammer, You have not explained that Kirito89 Posted https://imgur.com/a/OKAlIXC this email and accused me that this email was received for 0.01 btc and it was me who sent it from a email similar to mine ( Kerosinkiroz@gmail.com) but different with one later.
Here is his accusation:
[...]
Did you read those email of mine? was it sent on or before 28 December? Does time matter?
Of Fairness and Transparency as The Aim of The Thread
The player sent DuckDice an email asking for a refund if transparency can not be provided, despite the claim that the purpose of the threads are to get clarification of the losing streak. I can see that the emails are indeed sent from the players email address as shown on the other thread.
Here is his accusation:
[...]
Did you read those email of mine? was it sent on or before 28 December? Does time matter?
Of Fairness and Transparency as The Aim of The Thread
The player sent DuckDice an email asking for a refund if transparency can not be provided, despite the claim that the purpose of the threads are to get clarification of the losing streak. I can see that the emails are indeed sent from the players email address as shown on the other thread.
Forgive me, but... my narrative make you looking like a scammer? Kindly help me understand that email situation:
I asked you about it the day you made a post showing the intent of refund, that you assured us that all you seek is transparency over 158 losing streak. Of which, today, following the transparency that come unearthed, an edit of a post came:
A fair offer for what, if I may ask? I thought all you seek is transparency? A clarification of DuckDice Provable Fairness. So, what offer is that?
By the way you didn’t took into account, that you was suppose to get the evidances of accusations as well-Upon which we were agreed.
Did he provide you the Email that I sent demanding 0.01 btc? was the email similar to mine? Also how about trustpilot reviews link was it posted from my email? and You can see the bets is played on 33% chances right?
The 33% wining chances evidance you got was not this https://imgur.com/a/Z852R43 that I provided earlier to disprove Kirito89 claim of me never played there. It was different and was provided by kirito89 showing thousand of bets were played on 33% causing eye pain to you?
Anyway lets come to the proofs point.
Kirirto89 you have to show your evidences of me Sending blackmailing emails for 0.01btc
2. Trustpilot link- that my review was posted from the same email you was blackmailed from for 0.01 btc.
3. That I didn’t played on 15.5% chances but 33% chances.
4. You have provide evidences that the blackmailing email you have received is from the same email similar to mine but different with one later.
We are at the point where Kirito89 gotta back his accusations. I’ve accepted your deal, gave consent already Now the ball’s in his court.
Kirirto89 you have to show your evidences of me Sending blackmailing emails for 0.01btc
2. Trustpilot link- that my review was posted from the same email you was blackmailed from for 0.01 btc.
3. That I didn’t played on 15.5% chances but 33% chances.
4. You have provide evidences that the blackmailing email you have received is from the same email similar to mine but different with one later.
We are at the point where Kirito89 gotta back his accusations. I’ve accepted your deal, gave consent already Now the ball’s in his court.
Did he provide you the Email that I sent demanding 0.01 btc? was the email similar to mine? Also how about trustpilot reviews link was it posted from my email? and You can see the bets is played on 33% chances right?
The 33% wining chances evidance you got was not this https://imgur.com/a/Z852R43 that I provided earlier to disprove Kirito89 claim of me never played there. It was different and was provided by kirito89 showing thousand of bets were played on 33% causing eye pain to you?
The betting log were pulled from the server seed following the betID that you gave, thousands of of. So, it's safe to assume that even if that screenshot of betID is a bet that's stuck in between the log given to me, the bet still cover your betting history. Unless you played in tens of thousands of bets.
But, as I can see an attempt to grasp at straws when it happened in front of my very own face, let me make it way simpler for both of you, the player, and DuckDice, the casino:
Instead of going in circles and asking endless questions and pulling quotes, trying to give life to the case that's ended about few posts ago following the verdict, here's the fact, a simple one: the purpose of your thread [as you claimed it] was to prove that there was a manipulation in DuckDice's game, that there provable fairness is not... fair, as you lose 158 times in a row. Of which after a long and exhaustive process, both parties entered an agreement where the player will 100% trust me, holydarkness, to prove or disprove the root of the thread. Of which DuckDice through their representative, Kirito89, accepted and give their side of obligation in the deal by showing me the log.
The report of the findings was made, people can read them. Bottomline: the narratives are false.
So, unless you're interested to tell me one last mystery that I still wondered, about that "fair offer", you have two option: take this ruling and make peace with your past loses, or keep on throwing questions to steer the narrative into an endless cycle, and DuckDice or Kirito89 as the representative of DuckDice, who entered that written agreement with you, are allowed to raise a type-3 flag against you, for a breach of written contract.