Quote from: JollyGood on Today at 02:24:59 PM

Quote from: Rating Place on Today at 01:07:55 PM

The licensor will get stuck paying the judgement. FJ also has a data processing license in Costa Rica. That's what is used in Costa Rica.

For clarity, does that mean the Curacao licence authority will pay the OP the amount of the court judgement?

Quote from: LoyceV on Today at 01:58:56 PM

Quote from: JollyGood on Today at 12:54:50 PM

They now have a licence from The State of Anjouan

How does this not scare players? This is literally the first time I even hear about that country!

Anjouan offer licences for online casinos but there are conditions (including citizens of some countries that cannot use the casino: Australia, Austria, Comoros Islands, France, Germany, Netherlands, Spain, United Kingdom, USA and all FATF blacklisted countries).

The Curacao licence has a much smaller group of excluded countries/states therefore I cannot understand why FortuneJack decided to switch licences to Anjouan and accepted to lose access to massive markets with tens of millions of potential customers rather than just pay the $120,000 before the court judgement was made and keep the Curacao licence.

Whether it scares players or not they should understand the reason the casino moved to a different jurisdiction. Having an Anjouan licence in itself is not a problem but switching from Curacao to Anjouan could be if the circumstances are suspect. For example, BC.Game cited a 1931 law that makes it easy for the courts to be exploited by malicious actors therefore they moved licences from Curacao to Anjouan.

What is notable is that we have heard nothing from FortuneJack rgarding the matter.

Licensor Antillephone was a defendent in the court case. I know that other licensors were forced to pay judgements but I forget the case right now. I think it against licensor CIL.