Quote from: BenCodie on March 14, 2025, 01:49:42 PM

Quote from: nutildah on March 11, 2025, 01:23:44 PM

Quote from: BenCodie on March 11, 2025, 12:48:25 PM

I tried to raise awareness about this in regards to bc.game in this thread however members did not understand the point that the presence of complaints also is an indicator of victims who do not speak, instead my trust rating was impacted for making the thread by the campaign manager of bc.game, who claims that I am "spreading charlatan ideas under the guise of snake oil".

This issue isn't about you... And you're still going on about how the absence of something is evidence of anything. It's not.

It is reasonable to assume that out of the dozens of cases that bc.game have on this forum, that there are others who did not voice their problem on the forum (due to language barriers, unwillingness to comply with KYC, no hope, and so on). The assumption that 100% of those who have issues will use the forum to fight to get their funds back against a large casino is an unreasonable assumption. The proof is in the fact of how many cases there are against them. This applies also to other casinos.

Quote from: nutildah on March 11, 2025, 01:23:44 PM

Quote from: BenCodie on March 11, 2025, 12:48:25 PM

the Curacao Gaming Control Board is very likely to be a deeply corrupt entity or at the very least, has been negligent to a lot of corruption, fraud and malpractice in relation to the licensing scheme which a lot of these casinos in this forum rely on to operate, and those who are using curacao licenses.

The casino being advertised in your signature has a Curacao license. Roll Eyes

I've said it plenty of times before, if I don't wear the ad, a degenerate gambler who will wear the ad will give it back to casinos. Just because I don't believe in casinos, does not mean I'm not entitled to the advertising deals that they offer everyone on the forum. I could not care less about what is in my signature as long as they do not blatantly scam. I do not see any betfury scam accusation threads at rates in comparison to bc.game or stake, and if there are cases popping up anywhere near as often, I will stop wearing the campaign and talk to Royse about it.

Quote from: nutildah on March 11, 2025, 01:23:44 PM

Quote from: BenCodie on March 11, 2025, 12:48:25 PM

I don't find it particularly coincidental that a user who is making posts in relation to casino malpractice to have the worst reputation on the forum.

When you find yourself siding with game-protect, its time to take a long, deep period of introspection and perform an evaluation of what exactly are you doing with your time here and your life in general. Its not my fault you don't know who they are or what they did to become the least trusted account ever. Take a few minutes to educate yourself.

I've done enough reading to know game-protect and I am not speaking about that controversial account. I am definitely not going to say that 100% of what game-protect said was untrue, and I am definitely not going to say that the casino establishment did not have any involvement in tarnishing their account. What I will say, is game-protect is one of the accounts that are symbolic of the existence of shady casino practices and the members of the forum that directly or indirectly protect them, your post is a perfect example of that.

What happens if one day you find a thread with proof of all of what I am speaking about, including quotes of of all of your posts, all of which begging the question: did nutildah know all along and was nutildah covering up the truth. Are you going to deny it, and say, "how could I possibly have known?". Or will you own it? If the answer is "how could I possibly have known?" then I ask you - what is your motivation for posting so certainly that nothing shady is going on? Do you see the contradiction?

Quote from: nutildah on March 11, 2025, 01:23:44 PM

Quote from: BenCodie on March 11, 2025, 12:48:25 PM

There is nothing to verify "65,000 to 70,000 people online" or that 235,246 people participate in the daily race. There is nothing to disprove that 50,000+ of these are inflated or controlled by stake themselves to inflate activity and credibility (which is a common thing for corrupt entities t do) and there is nothing to prove that they are real.

Once again, when you make claims like this, its on you to provide the evidence to back them up, not on us to disprove them. Stake gets 55.44 MILLION visits a month. They are blowing the competition out of the water in that regard. So it doesn't seem totally irrational that their numbers would reflect 235,246 active daily participants, or more. This also means that they will have a lot more complaints than the average casino, both present and non-present. Does this mean they are completely clean in every way imaginable? No, it doesn't. But you haven't ever once provided proof or even evidence of jack shit.

I do not have unlimited free time and resources to spend on untangling the monolith of a web that it all is, to connect all of the dots that exist, articulate it as efficiently as possible and then present it in a way where people will actually read and care. While I've made good enough progress to speak as confidently as I do, you, I and everyone else who plays the proof card knows that it is a mission of hundreds (maybe thousands of) hours, that is very difficult to prove considering it is against those who are not strangers to anonymity. It is a low priority research hobby of mine with little to no incentive to complete, and for all I know when the thread is made, I could be banned, defamed, the thread could very well be deleted, so I'm not in any rush to complete it. Until then, I'll the forum outside of these conversations, whilst accumulating new quotes for as long as I like, like this one:

Quote from: nutildah on March 11, 2025, 01:23:44 PM

Does this mean they are completely clean in every way imaginable? No, it doesn't. But you haven't ever once provided proof or even evidence of jack shit.

Which becomes valid after proof is posted, as does a lot of the other junk that yourself and other high ranking members have posted in this last few months.

Quote from: nutildah on March 11, 2025, 01:23:44 PM

Quote from: BenCodie on March 11, 2025, 12:48:25 PM

Your post and that statistics/theory within it is weak at best.

Again... You are incapable of doing the slightest bit of introspection.

And you are a 100% honest, upstanding member of the forum who defends nothing but the good of and for the community, who is transparent and does not hide or post in attempt to cover up any damning information about his corrupt and disgusting peers whenever such information starts to seep Roll Eyes

Quote from: ryzaadit on March 12, 2025, 03:52:03 PM

Quote from: BenCodie on March 11, 2025, 12:48:25 PM

There is nothing to verify "65,000 to 70,000 people online" or that 235,246 people participate in the daily race. There is nothing to disprove that 50,000+ of these are inflated or controlled by stake themselves to inflate activity and credibility (which is a common thing for corrupt entities t do) and there is nothing to prove that they are real. The numbers you have posted are from Stake's database. They can not be validated on the Blockchain in any way, therefore they are not certain numbers. Your post and that statistics/theory within it is weak at best.

Counted by several reasons:
- Stake one of the biggest casino, their revenue already beats every single online casino
- Statistic how much $ being share on weekly bonus
- The deals are made on several sector (Influencer, Artist, Streamer, Sport, other) in 2021 they really spending a lot money to promoted and make streamer move to kics
- Not just cover the casino business, in early stage of "Kicks"..... Stake.com cover or handling mostly financial things for Kicks about the deals and those platform
- You also got data web view from @nutildah

Now, with all of the things they're doing. It's still possible the number on that scale, unless the number users online or participants in the tournament are really high but they never spending a lot money to promotion or spending to something else.

Quote from: ryzaadit on March 12, 2025, 03:52:03 PM

It's just my two cent, If you have second thoughts you can always share..... Just saying "The numbers you have posted are from Stake's database. They can not be validated on the Blockchain in any way" meaning your statement is not just for stake but for all casino. Cause been in 4 years on gambling, never seeing some casino provided us with data their customer register or online with blockchain stuff (especially for web2 casino).

Saying that number is real is as equal as saying it isn't. Casinos are businesses built on deception, why would their numbers make any difference? Can you or nutildah honestly say that 100% of accounts on Stake have absolutely no relation to stake themselves? That there are no bots or inflating of numbers? Please, that is naive of you to think...but nutildah is not naive.

Quote from: Dyno8050 on March 11, 2025, 07:33:50 PM

Quote from: nutildah on March 11, 2025, 01:23:44 PM

Sorry OP for derailing your topic. You seem like a rational person and I hope you get the issue resolved. This is my last post here.

Appreciate the recognition. I'm sure the topic wasn't too affected.

Sorry for derailing your topic as well however the casinos in this problem are a big problem and a symptom of that problem is exactly what you are experiencing. I am not sure if your case is resolved yet or not, though since you have come to the forum, I am sure it will eventually be solved at some stage (I hope so for you of course). A part of the problem, is if you hadn't come to the forum for some reason...I believe that you would be hopeless if you had not have voiced your problem external to Stake.

Quote from: AHOYBRAUSE on March 11, 2025, 01:13:22 PM

Quote from: BenCodie on March 11, 2025, 12:48:25 PM

There is nothing to verify "65,000 to 70,000 people online" or that 235,246 people participate in the daily race. There is nothing to disprove that 50,000+ of these are inflated or controlled by stake themselves to inflate activity and credibility (which is a common thing for corrupt entities t do) and there is nothing to prove that they are real. The numbers you have posted are from Stake's database. They can not be validated on the Blockchain in any way, therefore they are not certain numbers. Your post and that statistics/theory within it is weak at best.

Funny you write something like this and then back up a forum cancer like blackyjacky. Roll Eyes

And sorry man, really not the smartest post from you tbh. Stake is BY FAR the biggest site in the crypto business and I have no doubt about these numbers. But hey, you believe what you want to believe, that's fine.

By the way, this blackyjacky guy's reputation here is so bad because he is a straight up spammer and also blames casinos for his losses while not even understanding the basic math behind games and house edge. You shouldn't give him the slightest reason to post more of his nonsense. Every person that encourages the behavior he displays should reconsider his actions. Sad to see.

Anyway, if OP has a case and believes in his innocence he should just go to the mentioned mediation platforms to seek help. Here he won't see much help since not even Stunna is around anymore.

I am not backing anyone up, I speak from my own research, and from my research, the Curacao gaming control board is a corrupt authority that does not operate is intended, that the master license holders are a select few people who sell them, and that the Curacao gambling sector in general definitely fits in the description of corrupt.

All good, it's all relative. The fact that another person jumped in with the same experience just goes to show they're exit scamming (imho).

Quote from: Amihanski01 on March 14, 2025, 11:34:03 PM

They got me too for over $6000, this thread has encouraged me to open my own thread and share my story.
Fuck stake.com, fucking scammers.

Shit man, I'm sorry to hear. This is getting absolutely absurd.

They also refused to provide a player number for my curacao complaint. Interesting but nonetheless I will be going straight for the final process as casino.guru do not handle sports bets and I can only assume that askgamblers will be the same.