I never shifted the burden of proof on you (although we both were making claims). I did bear that by going through all the posts in the poll thread you suggested. Now that I have provided my argument by stating the dominant theme of the thread you want me to quote 30+ replies (sending alarms to so many members) here, no thank you.
Also stop strawmaning (I know you have years of practice but try it) every time. I never said reputable members are defending use of AI. I said they do not have a simplistic view of banning any AI usage in this forum.
Although I agree with ABCbits and can open a thread asking for open voting if you are willing to make a bet ($100 onwards). The title will be, 'Do you have a simplistic view of banning any AI usage in this forum?' Yes or NO.
Now, let's see you put your money where your mouth is.
Who do you think you are, you moron? I have to open a thread just because you say so and make a bet on your terms about whatever you feel like? You can shove it up your ass.
The facts are that I’m the only one who has opened constructive and positive threads about the use of AI on the forum, and anyone with eyes can see the opinions there. You go ahead and keep spewing your bullshit about fallacies and insisting that I have to prove whatever you feel like.
Aside from being one of the biggest bullshitters on the forum (on the level of BenCodie, meaning lots of text full of nonsense) you’re a well-known ass-licker. It’s no coincidence that the first person you put on your trust list was your manager.