Quote from: nutildah on Today at 12:43:22 PM

Medusah is extremely knowledgeable about Bitcoin and all-things privacy. I don't think they are an alt of the other accounts, which appear to be more generic. But the other accounts may be alts of accounts that also joined this "campaign." Any time someone is giving away BTC for something trivially easy to participate in, their thread will be flooded with alt farms. This is just the nature of the forum, and somewhat sadly, human beings.

Actually the accounts that are posting their BTC address after the main impersonating culprit has already been taken down (without suggesting they are contributing in any way) are more suspicious.

Just because they know about Bitcoin and all-things privacy, does not mean they aren't an alt. In fact, it makes it more likely that someone who joined in 2023 and has such knowledge is an alt, because having this level of knowledge with such a short period of time on the forum is rare.

They are also aware of how the activity system works since they joined:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3549558;sa=showPosts;start=400

If you view their posts from when they joined, just one or two posts in each activity period. Very informed posts too. Very strange for a new member to know so much about Bitcoin by default.

Trying to throw off a scent here nutildah or is this just another one of your "how could I have possibly known" moments?

I agree that Medusah is very likely to be an alt, and agree that this user waking up just for a share in the campaign is highly likely. Nice catch xLays.

Quote from: _act_ on Today at 12:47:04 PM

It is good that you bring this but I do not think they have any bad motives from waking up from their sleep. If anyone notice anything suspicious about the accounts, they can be tagged.

But I guess some people may still go ahead to give them neutral trust based on the fact that they have just woken up since a long period of time.

I disagree and believe that there are bad motives waking up from their sleep to participate in a highly and unusually lucrative campaign.

Quote from: _act_ on Today at 12:47:04 PM

It is good that you bring this but I do not think they have any bad motives from waking up from their sleep. If anyone notice anything suspicious about the accounts, they can be tagged.

But I guess some people may still go ahead to give them neutral trust based on the fact that they have just woken up since a long period of time.

If you read the exch campaign rules, you will noticed that no one can cheat. I am talking about this:

Quote from: eXch Support on March 14, 2025, 06:15:35 PM

We only consider to add new domains when they're older than 6 months.

Or do you think people will not have known such domain exist before 6 months?

When I read the campaign rules, I noticed anyone may not get any reward.

This has nothing to do with anything. It simply states that any phishing domains that are older than 6 months will be added to the campaign. Not relevant to this topic at all.