I told you I'm not going to even attempt to reason about what you wrote, because it is irrelevant.

Team douglas & bilibgin (I have no idea what he wrote, probably something on your defense and most likely more insults towards me): you two are the only guys here that make me an idiot, don't you ever find this weird?

Yes, you need a GPU farm to solve problems that require a GPU farm to be solved. Not fantasies.

Yes, this might mean you'll hear about that for the next 10 years, if that is what we have as a solution. Maybe FPGA and ASIC as well. Not fantasies.

Yes, Puzzle 67 was solved via massive amount of computing. Not fantasies.

I am not arguing with you because it is totally useless and has no purpose than to get both of us annoyed. Maybe someone else has more patience with you, I don't. The solver of puzzle 67 definitely didn't. ANd his remarks on your methods were basically one-liners conclusions of verything I ever tried to explain to you but you fail to accept:

- probabilities are consequences of an uniform distribution
- independent events have no history
- there is no difference between a range and a set of random indices
- YOU CANNOT ALTER events based on observations

You are viewing all of this exactly in the most opposite way possible, and I can't really help with this. So just follow my advice: keep going at it with all you got!

Meanwhile, stupid guys, who you so-call "geniuses" that "do not understand you", are full-blown scanning ranges in the fastest way that technology allows. Because implementing any of your ideas, that you consider smart, are actually totally unrealistic to manage or implement at scale.