Quote from: rachael9385 on Today at 08:46:27 AM

Quote from: Free Market Capitalist on March 19, 2025, 03:38:16 AM

Quote from: blomen on February 27, 2025, 07:40:50 PM

my question to you is: have you ever tried any of these strategies before? were you successful?

No, they are simply variants of the martingale, which is a strategy that has long been known not to work but that people insist on continuing to try, in some of its variants, and others continue to promote. You can be successful, but just as you can be “successful” in a casino session by being lucky or having a favorable short-term variance. As you increase your sample size, the probability of losing keeps increasing.

Every time you use the martingale system of betting the chances of winning reduces drastically, it's possible to be lucky with it and it's also possible to lose your entire bankroll constantly. Whatever variant of the martingale strategy you have also deals with doubling your losses to recover and this will always remain a failed system because in the long run you would lose more than you actually make from it. This system doesn't work well with bankroll management.

It doesn't work. It ain't a strategy. It's more like a greedy person's revenge game, and trying to climb back as quickly as he can. It's actually not far from just betting on the same amount. The RTP will somehow work, but we don't know when it will be. Sometimes we are going to lose $1000 first and then get back $900 after a month of playing. Of course, we are going to lose because of the house edge, but it will depend on us if we are going to lose fast or we are going to take it slow while enjoying the games.