What is your position on this proposal?
IMO the idea of "burning" (some people call it "freezing") is less worse than idea of redistribute Bitcoin from all vulnerable address, which also bring debate on how to perform the redistribution.
[q
The idea of redistributing Bitcoin is so wrong that I can't even begin to consider how to argue against it.
What if they "move" the burned coin to the "tail emission" of the protocol?
If you burn 1 million "weak" coins, you will add 1 million tail emission after the 32nd halving at one satoshi per block.
We should be ok for the next couple of billion years.