Quote from: nutildah on March 22, 2025, 02:23:52 PM

Quote from: alani123 on March 22, 2025, 12:46:16 PM

I don't understand why notildah has to beef with bencodie so often. It's starting to become the new staple of forum relationships haha. Grin

I'm tired of this asshole trolling me, calling me corrupt & etc. without ever putting forth any substance to back it up.

I have called you this as you have displayed that behavior. On several occasions, I've welcomed you to deny any involvement or association with corruption in the forum, each time you refuse to deny it or even address the statement.

Quote from: nutildah on March 22, 2025, 02:23:52 PM

Quote from: alani123 on March 22, 2025, 12:46:16 PM

I don't understand why notildah has to beef with bencodie so often. It's starting to become the new staple of forum relationships haha. Grin

If you read the thread, you'll notice I commented first and then he made a snarky reply, basically accusing me of being at least one of the accounts in question. Which is fucking stupid, and as with every single other allegation he's ever made, completely baseless.

I made this snarky reply (being, throwing off the scent) as what you had said to excuse the account of waking up and taking advantage of the campaign was far from logical. I still believe that my post was fine. I welcome others aside from yourself and those associated with yourself to disagree.

As for other allegations, aside from mentioning that my research supports that a lot is amiss, it is also backed by your continual avoidance to deny that something is amiss. Since we have begun our back and forth when theymos had announced the new forum software would not be released, you and others have refused to deny involvement or association with corruption in the forum. This has mostly what has fueled my distaste for you, your own posts and actions. You see, I've been keeping tabs for some time. No, they do not include blockchain evidence however they do suggest that the higher echelons of the forum are not squeaky clean. After yourself, LoyceV, and others refused to deny any existence of corruption, it fueled the conclusions that those tabs have been suggesting, and I let out more than I should have. I have said many times and said from the very beginning that the call for evidence and proof is a tough mission, a time consuming mission, maybe even an impossible one due to the skill level of those who are involved, and one that I simply cannot sacrifice the time or resources to pursue as intended, let alone have the capacity to defend when inevitably it is myself against many. This does not mean I will not post at all, though I will (out of fairness and what is right) dial back on being certain about conclusions and instead efficiently communicate my research from the position of bettering the community, instead of coming after you and others.

As I said in my last post, I will ignore you from now and I hope that you can do the same, until I make my thread, then we can continue to discuss there.