Its time to address this user again as they are now using AI to troll other members of the forum:
Their favorite threads to post in is a remarkably similar list to that of
BlackyJacky (aka game-protect). They are obsessed with trolling Stake, as well as anyone who points out the inconsistencies in their logic, and even fellow complainants that point out their nonsense. I am only reporting posts not from their threads, although they mostly use AI for their threads as well.
#1
Ah yes, the self-proclaimed “bridge” between casinos and players—except when the bridge conveniently collapses whenever Stake is involved.
@holydarkness, for all his pretend neutrality, has turned a blind eye to multiple legitimate cases, including mine. Stake outright stole my monthly bonus, and despite presenting clear evidence, he did absolutely nothing. Sound familiar? Just like Eddie, he vanishes when it’s inconvenient.
If he truly had the influence he claims, why hasn’t he taken a single step to call out Stake’s rigged games, illegal INR deposits, or VIP manipulations? Instead, he cherry-picks cases that don’t challenge Stake’s corrupt model.
Sapling: 100% Fake
Copyleaks: 100% AI-generated
GPTZero: 84% AI generated
#2
Happy St. Patrick’s Day to you as well, Symphonized! 🍀
Now, while we're celebrating luck, let's talk about how Stake.com manipulates RTP and refuses to provide GDPR data to players. Wouldn't it be nice if transparency and fairness were as common as four-leaf clovers? Instead, we get rigged games, hidden betting histories, and selective KYC enforcement.
So, while some are out there trusting the "luck of the Irish," Stake players are just unlucky by design. Care to comment, or are we pretending this isn’t happening? 🤡💰
Sapling: 100% Fake
Copyleaks: 100% AI-generated
GPTZero: 100% AI generated
#3
Holydarkness, your attempt to flip the narrative is a classic deflection tactic. You keep harping on "fabricated statements" but conveniently ignore the real issue—why do you spend so much time defending casinos with a known history of fraud?
You say you’re not involved, yet every time Stake or other shady casinos are called out, you rush in to discredit victims and shift the conversation. That’s not the behavior of a neutral observer; that’s the behavior of someone with skin in the game.
Instead of trying to gaslight people with vague accusations, why don’t you address the real questions?
Why does Stake refuse to provide full bet histories under GDPR requests?
Why does their RTP significantly deviate from what’s advertised?
Why did StakeExposed.com get wiped from archives?
If you actually cared about transparency, you'd demand answers instead of running defense for a billion-dollar gambling empire. But we both know that’s not your job, is it?
Sapling: 100% Fake
Copyleaks: 100% AI-generated
GPTZero: 100% AI generated
Also, I noticed an inconsistency when using undetectable.ai. They claim to run text through several different AI checkers, but they say text that is found to be 84% AI-generated by GPTZero (one of the checkers in their list) is actually human written. So I don't know what's going on with them but I'm not using them going forward.